United International Business Schools - UIBS vs ISG International Business School vs Waseda University vs Aoyama Gakuin University - AGU vs Tokyo University of Science
Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
- +Prime Tokyo location and multicultural environment
- +Conducive learning environment and supportive infrastructure
- +Strong academic reputation for career success
- +Engaging seminars and relevant programs
- +Superb location and peaceful campus atmosphere
- +Excellent teachers and well-structured language classes
- +Friendly and helpful staff and students
- +Strong academic programs with practical application
- +Development of teamwork and professional skills
Nothing to show
- +Affordable and flexible study options
- +Self-paced learning opportunities
- +Requires self-discipline
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a significant problem.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and clear communication is a persistent concern.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is prevalent.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **location**, boasting a near-perfect score, and its **facilities**, which are also highly regarded. Student life and professor quality are rated solidly. However, **accommodation** stands out as a notable weakness, receiving a significantly lower score compared to other areas. The university also presents a moderately international environment, with average ratings for value and internationality.
The university exhibits its strongest performance in Location and Student Life, both receiving perfect scores. Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accommodations present the weakest area with a rating of 3. Facilities and Internationality score moderately, while Value is also a positive aspect. This suggests an excellent student experience and academic environment, with room for improvement in housing options.
This institution excels in **location**, receiving a perfect score of 5. **Student life** and **professors** also stand out with strong ratings of 4. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the greatest area for improvement, rated at 2.5. Facilities and value are moderately rated at 3.5, while internationality is rated 3.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent scores in key areas, notably **Accomodation, Location, and Value**, all receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly rated. Conversely, the university's **Facilities and Student Life** are areas with room for improvement, each scoring a moderate 3 out of 5. Internationality also sits at a respectable 3. Overall, the strengths significantly outweigh the weaker aspects.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~80% of feedback being highly favorable. Students praise the multicultural experience, great professors, and convenient Tokyo location. There is no negative feedback.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, ~67% are positive. Students praise the demanding yet fun seminars, convenient location, and extensive library. Teachers and the program's relevance are also highlighted positively.
With 2 reviews and a 4/5 average, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight friendly staff and helpful interactions, along with gaining valuable knowledge and teamwork skills in their studies.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, reviews indicate the university is seen as affordable and flexible, allowing self-paced study. The learning experience is described as self-directed, requiring significant self-discipline. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
