United International Business Schools - UIBS vs ISG International Business School vs Tokyo Metropolitan University - TMU vs Tokyo University of Science vs Kanto Gakuin University
Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
- +English-taught programs & international student support
- +High-quality research & academic rigor
- +Convenient location & exchange opportunities
- +Friendly and helpful staff and students
- +Strong academic programs with practical application
- +Development of teamwork and professional skills
- +Diverse specializations and supportive professors.
- +Welcoming environment for international students.
Nothing to show
- +Kind and supportive teachers
- +Enjoyable and engaging learning
- +Positive campus and social life
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspiring teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and clear communication is a persistent concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Students express frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is a recurring concern.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its **facilities** and **professors**, both receiving a near-perfect 4.7. The **location** also scores highly at 4.5. However, **student life** and **accommodation** present significant areas for improvement, with ratings of 3.2 and 2.5 respectively. **Internationality** and **value** fall in the middle range, both at 3.5.
This institution excels in **location**, receiving a perfect score of 5. **Student life** and **professors** also stand out with strong ratings of 4. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the greatest area for improvement, rated at 2.5. Facilities and value are moderately rated at 3.5, while internationality is rated 3.
This institution receives outstanding marks across a broad spectrum of criteria. It excels in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all earning a perfect score. The sole area receiving a slightly lower, though still excellent, rating is Location, at four out of five.
Nothing to show
Exceptional scores highlight the university's strengths in facilities, professors, internationality, and value, all earning a 4.5. Student life and accommodation also received positive marks at 4. The university's location is its least rated aspect, scoring a 3.5. Overall, the institution demonstrates a high standard in academic and community support, with a slight area for improvement in its geographic placement.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
Based on one review, this university has a high average rating of 4/5. Students appreciate the excellent research quality and English-taught programs, with ~100% positive feedback.
With 2 reviews and a 4/5 average, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight friendly staff and helpful interactions, along with gaining valuable knowledge and teamwork skills in their studies.
With a 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a wide range of specializations and supportive professors. International students feel well-supported with cultural events and resources for those with limited Japanese.
Nothing to show
With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students enjoyed their busy campus life, attending classes, working on assignments, and socializing with friends. Teachers were described as kind and supportive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
