United International Business Schools - UIBS vs ISG International Business School vs Tokyo Metropolitan University - TMU vs Aoyama Gakuin University - AGU vs National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies - GRIPS
Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
- +English-taught programs & international student support
- +High-quality research & academic rigor
- +Convenient location & exchange opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Diverse international student body and multicultural environment.
- +Historic building and excellent transportation access
- +Convenient downtown location for breaks and socializing
- +Ample facilities and support services
- +Diverse study abroad opportunities
- +Flexible and convenient self-study spaces
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspiring teaching.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of necessary resources and outdated curriculum hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring problems.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its **facilities** and **professors**, both receiving a near-perfect 4.7. The **location** also scores highly at 4.5. However, **student life** and **accommodation** present significant areas for improvement, with ratings of 3.2 and 2.5 respectively. **Internationality** and **value** fall in the middle range, both at 3.5.
Nothing to show
Consistently outstanding scores mark this university's performance. Across all assessed areas, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, a perfect 5/5 rating signifies excellence. Accommodation and location also received top marks. With a perfect score of 5/5 for value, it appears to offer a comprehensive and highly satisfactory experience without any discernible weak points.
This institution garners exceptional scores for its **facilities** and **location**, both receiving perfect marks. **Student life** also shines with a top rating. Conversely, **accommodation** presents a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 2 out of 5. Other aspects like **professors**, **internationality**, and overall **value** are rated positively, indicating a generally well-rounded experience despite the noted housing challenges.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving strong ratings. The **Value** proposition also appears to be a notable positive. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a considerably lower score. Other aspects, including **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, fall into a middle tier of performance.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
Based on one review, this university has a high average rating of 4/5. Students appreciate the excellent research quality and English-taught programs, with ~100% positive feedback.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight an enriching, multicultural experience with diverse international engagement.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Recurring themes highlight the historic and elegant building, convenient downtown location with excellent public transport access, and enjoyable social opportunities.
With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive feedback, students highlight extensive facilities, ample study spaces, and global study opportunities. No negative comments were recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
