United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Universidad de Córdoba - UCO vs Kostanay Engineering and Economics University vs IMT Atlantique – Graduate Engineering School vs ISG International Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Strong academic programs and high quality teaching
- +Positive professor-student relationships and good faculty support
- +Excellent practical experience and career opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with relevant industry skills.
- +Accessible and flexible learning options, including distance education and technology.
- +Supportive faculty and opportunities for student leadership and development.
- +Strong French language support
- +Rigorous academic programs
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
- +Welcoming academic atmosphere and helpful staff
- +Affordable and tasty food options
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and equipment are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and engagement.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources were a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support was a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
- -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support cause dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Student Life** and **Professors**, both receiving a high rating of 4.25. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also score well at 4. However, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, rated at 2.5, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. The university generally offers good **Value** and a decent **Location**, both scoring 3.75.
Presenting a uniform score of zero across all surveyed categories, this university demonstrates a consistent lack of exceptional performance in any given area. From facilities and professors to location and student life, no aspect emerged as a particular strength. Similarly, accommodation, internationality, and overall value also received no positive distinction, indicating a consistent absence of standout features or areas of excellence according to the ratings provided.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving high ratings. Areas of average performance include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accommodation**. The university offers a well-rounded experience with particularly positive aspects in its infrastructure, student engagement, global outlook, and cost-effectiveness.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
This institution garners excellent feedback, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation. Its location also receives strong marks. The weakest area identified is internationality, scoring 3.5, suggesting room for growth in global engagement. Overall, the university offers significant value, indicated by its solid rating of 4.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
With ~73% positive reviews and an average rating of 3.91/5, students highlight a strong academic system, helpful professors, and positive student-professor relationships. Minor administrative speed issues were noted.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students appreciate distance learning, practical application, entrepreneurship skills, and challenging tasks from instructors.
With a 4/5 average rating, student feedback is predominantly positive. One reviewer highlighted a challenging yet rewarding academic experience with French and English program requirements.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4 out of 5, approximately 50% of feedback is positive, highlighting an excellent academic environment with friendly staff and affordable, delicious food. There is no negative feedback recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Hello! I studied at this university from 2009 to 2012, specializing in the organization of transportation, motion and the exploration of transport. It was a bachelor. I entered the university after graduating from college in this speciality, and I particularly liked that the teachers tried to expand their knowledge and gave tasks to complicate their implementation. Also worth mentioning is that I was given the opportunity to be the first chairman of the student council of the campus and develop its charter.
IMT Atlantique Brest was an interesting phase in my academic life. Coming from an Anglophone educational system to a Francophone teaching style was quite a challenge at the beginning, but worthwhile in the end. My programme was in both French and English(60/40). Although I spoke a bit of French, it still required more knowledge to sail through the programme. This was made possible through the school's compulsory weekly French classes. The programme was very rigorous as we spent most of our time in class, in lab sessions or doing group projects. The professors are knowledgeable in their field and try to engage the students in each lesson, although some of them aren't good at transferring knowledge appropriately. The career seminars and job dating events were very beneficial in finding an internship and a job in the long run. Lastly, the intercultural environment helped me learn about different cultures, and also prepare me to work in multicultural teams in the real world. Overall, it was a good experience as I learned to study in a new language, make new friends and stand on my own in a new country. I just wish I did more research into the French teaching style before starting the programme.
Nothing to show
Excellent academic environment. Friendly lab mates and professors. Food service is inexpensive and delicious. The only thing I dislike was the extreme humid and hot summer days. Other than that, everything is excellent.
Nothing to show
