Czech Technical University in Prague - CVUT vs Universidad estatal de Guayaquil - UG vs National Aviation University vs Central Bedfordshire College vs Berry College

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Central Bedfordshire College (5.00)
Czech Technical University in Prague - CVUT: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad estatal de Guayaquil - UG: wins 0/6 categories
National Aviation University: wins 0/6 categories
Central Bedfordshire College: wins 5/6 categories
Berry College: wins 0/6 categories
Laguna Tech College - LTC: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Garut: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Chemistry
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Bedfordshire, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Law
Floyd County, Georgia, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Pomona, California, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Garut, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Public Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.46
4.25
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.15
4.25
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.31
4.40
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.00
4.00
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Student life
4.31
4.00
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.31
4.20
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.85
Win
3.75
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert faculty & modern, practical curriculum
  • +Strong career support & global recognition
  • +Well-regarded technical programs
  • +Passionate professors and enriching practical/theoretical learning
  • +Opportunities for self-improvement and exposure to new environments/people
  • +Diverse faculties and recognized programs within Ecuador
  • +Excellent faculty and engaging teaching methods
  • +Valuable practical experience and career preparation
  • +Supportive learning environment and strong community
  • +Supportive and understanding staff
  • +Meaningful educational experience
  • +Flexibility and personalized support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive lecturers and relevant curriculum
  • +Opportunities for real-world application and professional development
  • +Continuous institutional growth and improvement
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the quality and accessibility of resources and support.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor English proficiency among professors.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
  • -Ineffective teaching and a curriculum that doesn't meet student needs are also major complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners high marks for its **Facilities**, scoring a notable 4.46. Professors, student life, and overall value are also well-regarded, all receiving a consistent 4.31. Internationality sits at a solid 4.0. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a rating of 3.85, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

Overall, this institution garners positive feedback. Its strongest areas are **Professors**, receiving a near-perfect score, and **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value**, all scoring above 4.2. **Accommodations** present the only area falling below a 4.0 rating, marking it as the weakest aspect. The university also fares well in **Student Life** and **Internationality**.

This institution's ratings present a mixed picture. Its strongest points are location, earning a respectable 3, suggesting good accessibility and surroundings. However, areas such as accommodation, professors, facilities, student life, and internationality all received a 2, indicating a need for significant improvement in these crucial aspects of the student experience. The value also received a 2, reflecting concerns about the return on investment.

Exceptional scores highlight this institution's strengths, with perfect ratings across facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value. However, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, receiving a score of zero, indicating a considerable area for improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an outstanding score in **Location** (5), this institution shines. However, its **Internationality** (1) presents a significant area for improvement. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value are consistent, all landing in the mid-range at 3 or 4, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 16 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, useful projects, and career help, noting high-quality, modern education and opportunities for internships and jobs.

The university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the enriching learning environments and the opportunity for self-improvement.

The single review indicates a highly negative experience. The reviewer cited old equipment not meeting program needs and professors with poor English proficiency, even in an English-taught program. This represented ~100% of feedback, resulting in a 1/5 average rating.

With one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. The sole feedback highlighted a positive educational experience with supportive and flexible staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly favorable. Students highlight a supportive college experience, a relevant curriculum, and competent, approachable lecturers.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
29%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
56%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
6%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Quality of CVUT

Firstly, I would like to mention that CVUT is one of the best unis in Czech Republic. After graduating it gives a plenty of opportunities to work since its certificate is recognised around the world in huge companies. It’s not a secret that not all of the students can work while studying, it’s quite difficult to study there but it worth it. Inside, every faculty’s building is modern. Especially FIT, where I am studying now looks great. Professors and tutors create opportunity to study, they can answer to all your questions if there are. Secondly, getting to the uni is not that difficult even if you live far from it. Transportation in public is so developed and trams can get you anywhere quickly. For instance, I am living in Prague 3 and uni is located in Prague 6, even though in map it the distance could be seen so far, by using tram I get to the uni in 20-30 minutes. To sum up, it can be difficult to study there and subject can be hard too but it worth it since after it creates you a huge opportunity to work in successful companies without any doubt.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close