Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI vs IES LV "Juan Ramón Fernández" - LV vs Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT vs National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento - UNGS (5.00)
Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI: wins 6/7 categories
IES LV "Juan Ramón Fernández" - LV: wins 0/7 categories
Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT: wins 0/7 categories
National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento - UNGS: wins 1/7 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Audiovisual Communication
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: System Engineering
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Professors
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.63
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent support and resources
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities
  • +Practical experience and industry connections
  • +Accessible and career-focused with internship/work opportunities
  • +Supportive environment for academic and career guidance
  • +Wide range of specialization options

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Expert professors and supportive environment
  • +Comfortable, large, and safe campus
  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Disorganized administrative processes and poor communication.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Rating summary
What students say

Impressively high marks distinguish this university across most aspects of student experience. Facilities, location, accommodation, and value are particularly strong, all receiving a near-perfect 4.75. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.625. Professors are rated highly at 4.5, representing the most moderate score within this excellent overall assessment.

This institution garners excellent scores across most aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life is the sole area receiving a slightly lower, yet still strong, rating of 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, earning a perfect score. It also receives consistently positive feedback for its facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value, all rated at 4 out of 5. The weakest areas for the university are its location and internationality, both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5.

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~91% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent education, supportive staff, modern campus facilities, and career opportunities. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible career paths and helpful staff. The remaining ~33% of feedback is not negative.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a comfortable, safe, and supportive environment. Expert professors and beautiful grounds are praised. No negative feedback was received.

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
33%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
27%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
27%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close