Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires - ITBA vs Universidad de Belgrano - UB vs UCES vs Universidad Favaloro

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV (5.00)
Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE: wins 0/2 categories
Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires - ITBA: wins 2/2 categories
Universidad de Belgrano - UB: wins 0/2 categories
UCES: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Favaloro: wins 0/2 categories
Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV: wins 0/2 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Communications
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Translation and Intercultural Communication
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.75
5.00
Win
4.00
3.33
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.75
5.00
4.50
4.00
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Professors
4.50
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Internationality
4.63
5.00
3.00
3.67
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Student life
4.63
5.00
Win
3.00
3.67
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Value
4.75
5.00
3.50
3.67
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.75
5.00
3.50
3.00
Not rated
5.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent support and resources
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities
  • +Practical experience and industry connections
  • +Excellent and dedicated teachers preparing for real-world challenges
  • +Supportive learning environment and community
  • +Strong focus on technology and engineering
  • +Academic validity and expert tutors
  • +Modern and accessible facilities
  • +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
  • +Flexible scheduling and multiple campus locations
  • +Positive overall college experience

Nothing to show

  • +Emphasis on teacher training and translation degrees
  • +Esteemed faculty and industry experts
  • +Comprehensive curriculum blending theory and practice
  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common grievances.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes criticized.
  • -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
  • -Poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and course content.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of practical experience and unclear course structure is disappointing.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Rating summary
What students say

Impressively high marks distinguish this university across most aspects of student experience. Facilities, location, accommodation, and value are particularly strong, all receiving a near-perfect 4.75. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.625. Professors are rated highly at 4.5, representing the most moderate score within this excellent overall assessment.

Across all surveyed aspects, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating an outstanding educational experience. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. There are no weak areas identified; the university demonstrates exceptional strength in every category evaluated.

The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.

This university presents a solid profile, excelling particularly in the quality of its professors and its attractive location, both scoring a perfect 4. Student life, internationality, and value are also strong points, all rated at a good 3.67. However, accommodation is identified as a weaker area, receiving a rating of 3, with facilities also trailing slightly behind at 3.33.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value. Facilities and student life also receive high marks, scoring a strong 4 out of 5. The only area not explicitly rated is its weakest, though the provided data indicates outstanding performance across all surveyed aspects.

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~91% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent education, supportive staff, modern campus facilities, and career opportunities. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent teachers and strong preparation for the workforce. Facilities are acceptable and undergoing remodeling.

Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.

With a 3.25 average rating, most feedback is positive (~74%) highlighting dynamism and flexibility in course scheduling and venue options across multiple locations. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

The single review for Ens en Lenguas Vivas Sofia E. Broquen de Spangenberg is highly positive, giving it a 5/5 rating. This 100% positive sentiment highlights the university's excellence in language education, particularly its teacher training and translation programs.

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
27%
50%
50%
25%
0%
0%
100%
3★
27%
0%
0%
75%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Good place to study E technology in BA.

Undoubtedly Buenos Aires is a big city with many options in terms of higher education, but the Technological Institute is undoubtedly the best option (in my opinion) to study everything related to technology. I studied computer and data engineering, the experience was great. The teachers are qualified, the facilities are acceptable, and the classmates were very supportive.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close