Swinburne University of Technology vs Monash University vs Melbourne Institute of Technology vs Melbourne Business School vs Melbourne Polytechnic
Side-by-side comparison from 123 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Comprehensive curriculum with practical skills emphasis
- +High-quality teaching and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for electives, exchange programs, and work-integrated learning
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty
- +Excellent facilities and modern campus environment
- +Diverse community and valuable personal development opportunities
- +Helpful and friendly staff and teachers
- +Great facilities and resources
- +Career advancement opportunities
- +Life-changing educational experience and career readiness
- +Supportive community and valuable peer connections
- +Excellent study environment and resources
- +Supportive faculty and personalized learning
- +Practical, hands-on, and job-focused learning
- +Enriching and well-rounded educational experience
- +Innovative and supportive learning environment
- +Dedicated, experienced, and passionate teaching staff
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities for hands-on learning
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- -Teachers are unhelpful and actively work against students' success.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of practical, industry-relevant learning and underwhelming course content.
- -Insufficient career opportunities and support services.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support leads to feeling overlooked.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of student support are significant drawbacks.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff and administration.
- -Uninspiring or poorly structured curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring exceptionally high. Its **Facilities** and **Value** also receive very positive marks. The **Accomodation** category, however, stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular advantages in global reach and its physical setting.
Remarkably high marks were achieved in several areas, with Internationality (4.49) and Professors (4.48) standing out as the strongest aspects. Facilities also scored well at 4.35. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the lowest-rated category at 3.74. The university also received solid scores for Student Life (4.16), Location (4.08), and Value (4.25), indicating a generally positive, though not uniformly exceptional, student experience.
This institution garners impressive scores across multiple aspects, notably excelling in its Professors, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a strong 4.33. Student Life, Accommodation, and Location also score well at 4. While the university demonstrates considerable strengths, its Facilities, at 3.67, represent its lowest-rated area.
This institution receives outstanding marks across the board, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Its only slight deviation from a perfect score is in location, which still garners a very respectable rating. The university's strengths are clearly in its comprehensive offerings and student experience.
This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. Its location stands out as a particular strength, alongside its excellent facilities and student life. While accommodation and value are also highly regarded, the university's internationality registers as its weakest, though still a respectable score. Professors also receive a commendable rating.
Remarkably, this institution achieves perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a stellar 5. Similarly, the value proposition for students also garners a top rating of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded educational experience with no discernible weaknesses in any of these areas.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive curriculum, good teaching quality, and diverse electives. A small percentage of feedback expressed concerns about faculty.
The university garners high praise, with ~96% positive reviews. Students highlight knowledgeable faculty, modern facilities, and diverse programs. A small percentage (~3.4%) mentioned concerns about cost-cutting and less practical learning experiences.
With all 3 reviews being positive (100%), students highlight great facilities, helpful teachers, and a positive university culture. The average rating is an excellent 4.67 out of 5.
With an average rating of 5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight life-changing experiences, strong support systems, quality education, and career readiness. They also appreciate university events, study spaces, and library resources.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (over ~100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise high-quality, approachable lecturers and a practical, job-focused learning approach with valuable hands-on experience.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, feedback highlights dedicated, passionate teaching staff and modern, well-equipped facilities. The university offers diverse courses for various career goals and learning styles.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
They are thugs. Don't ever go to them. The teachers are part of the cartel who do not help students to let them fail and earn millions of dollars. Infrastructure is the best but the teachers are the worst.
The degree matched its expectation and was in line with goals set before starting the degree. The most important aspect of the degree was to build the latest skills in my domain and be able to interact with the industry. Both of these were well provided by the university. Would definitely recommend it to others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Technical university of Melbourne is a top and leading university in Australia. The education system is very high class. Students are very much satisfied with the university and the courses and also with professor ls.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
