University of Calgary vs Ambrose University vs Robertson College vs Mount Royal University - MRU vs Southern Alberta Institute of Technology - SAIT
Side-by-side comparison from 198 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and research opportunities
- +Dedicated and supportive professors
- +Flexible learning options and campus engagement
- +Supportive and personable staff/professors
- +Excellent campus facilities and environment
- +Engaging coursework and academic support
- +Dedicated support for student success and excellent teaching
- +Accessible and well-structured programs
- +Supportive and inclusive community with strong professor-student relationships.
- +Engaging student life and extracurricular activities.
- +Small class sizes fostering connection and personalized support.
- +Practical skills and real-world preparation
- +Supportive and helpful instructors
- +Well-managed programs and resources
- +Supportive instructors and engaging learning environment
- +Diverse and welcoming international student community
- +Valuable programs with practical experiences
- -Lack of course availability and competition for enrollment.
- -Poor teaching quality and administrative issues in academic departments.
- -University's lack of responsiveness to student concerns and issues of harassment/retaliation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources frustrate students.
- -Some students find the curriculum and teaching methods unsatisfactory.
- -Ineffective teaching and poor course structure.
- -Excessive and unnecessary fees.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support create feelings of neglect.
This institution garners strong scores across multiple facets, with Internationality standing out as a particular strength at 4.35. Facilities and Location also receive high marks, both above 4.2. Areas for potential improvement include Student Life, which is the lowest rated category at 3.99, closely followed by Accomodation at 3.92. Professors and Value achieve identical scores of 4.06.
Performance across surveyed categories reveals a well-rounded institution. Accommodation stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, student life received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other areas such as professors, internationality, and value all received strong marks, suggesting a positive overall experience for students.
This institution excels in core academic and infrastructural aspects, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and location. However, it faces significant challenges in student life and accommodation, both scoring zero. Internationality is rated moderately at three, while the overall value proposition is strong at four.
This institution receives commendation across several key areas. Facilities and professors stand out with the highest ratings, indicating strengths in these core educational components. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and location also show positive feedback, all scoring above 4.0. Value for money is also a notable strength, with a solid rating. The university presents a well-rounded offering, with its strongest aspects lying in its academic resources and teaching staff.
This institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. **Facilities** also score very well. The university garners solid scores in **Student Life**, **Value**, and **Professors**. **Accomodation** is the comparatively lowest-rated aspect, though still generally positive.
This institution garners exceptional scores for its **Facilities**, achieving a near-perfect 4.83. **Professors** and **Location** also score highly, both at 4.5, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life** and **Internationality**. **Value** is another significant strength at 4.67. The only area receiving a comparatively lower rating is **Accomodation**, standing at 3.8.
~86% of 103 reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, research opportunities, and professor dedication. A small ~4% of negative feedback notes issues with course availability and underfunding in some programs.
With ~88% positive feedback, students praise personable professors, engaging coursework, excellent facilities, and a vibrant campus atmosphere. Some note that lectures rely heavily on PowerPoints. No negative reviews were recorded.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with its programs being highly accessible and professors well-educated. Students appreciate the institution's attentiveness and dedication to their success.
With 39 reviews averaging 4.38/5, ~92% are positive, praising community, small class sizes, and faculty support. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4.42/5 average rating from 24 reviews, ~96% of feedback is positive, highlighting well-managed courses, helpful professors, and practical, real-world skills development. A small amount of negative feedback exists.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 6 reviews, approximately 83% are highly positive. Students praise the friendly environment, diverse cultures, valuable programs, and supportive instructors, especially for international students. No negative feedback was recorded.
Months before I was due to graduate, I faced harassment from two Physics and Astronomy department heads due to having a disability. I submitted a harassment complaint and instead of resolving the situation, the dean of the science faculty, the vice provost student experience and vice provost EDI retaliated and I had to deal with assault from an associate dean. The math courses, physics courses and computer science courses I took were universally poorly taught, and poorly administered. There is no support for students with disabilities and those who are othered are treated harshly and unfairly.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I took the software development program at SAIT. This was riddled with teachers that don't actually know what they are teaching but just reading off premade PowerPoints. The class is set-up to incentivize lazy group members to not do their work as you would lose grades for a group member that doesn't do their work, so everyone just lied to the teachers and did the work for their lazy group members. There's a ton of mandatory fee's that you have to pay and don't even need or have access to most of them. The gym was under construction the entire time I was at SAIT, meaning no intramural sports or anything like that, yet there was fee's for that. I live walking distance from SAIT and tried to refute the 140$ mandatory bus pass because I didn't use it once, they still made me pay every semester. You graduate and want to see your transcript? 20$. Everything about this school sucked and I regret going, please reconsider for your sake.
Nothing to show