University of Calgary vs Ambrose University vs Robertson College vs Mount Royal University - MRU vs Alberta University of the Arts - AUArts

Side-by-side comparison from 187 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Calgary: wins 0/6 categories
Ambrose University: wins 1/6 categories
Robertson College: wins 2/6 categories
Mount Royal University - MRU: wins 0/6 categories
Alberta University of the Arts - AUArts: wins 0/6 categories
Prairie Bible Institute - Prairie Aviation Training Centre - PATC: wins 2/6 categories
Bow Valley College: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Calgary, Canada
4.20
Read more reviews
109 reviews
×
Best programme: Engineering
Calgary, Canada
4.00
Read more reviews
26 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Brandon, Canada
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Veterinary Medicine
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Arts
Best programme: Youth and Community Work
Calgary, Canada
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.24
4.17
5.00
Win
4.35
3.25
4.00
4.83
Location
4.27
4.21
5.00
Win
4.16
4.25
4.00
4.50
Professors
4.06
4.19
5.00
4.33
4.75
5.00
4.33
Internationality
4.34
4.19
3.00
4.18
3.25
4.00
4.50
Win
Student life
3.98
4.00
Not rated
4.13
3.25
5.00
Win
4.50
Value
4.09
4.04
4.00
4.30
3.75
5.00
Win
4.67
Accommodation
3.93
4.24
Win
Not rated
4.19
3.75
4.00
3.80
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive learning environment and engaging faculty
  • +Strong research opportunities and resources
  • +Flexibility and accessibility for students
  • +Supportive and personable staff/professors
  • +Excellent campus facilities and environment
  • +Engaging coursework and academic support
  • +Dedicated support for student success and excellent teaching
  • +Accessible and well-structured programs
  • +Small class sizes and strong community support.
  • +Engaging student life and inclusive environment.
  • +Effective learning environment and helpful staff.
  • +Access to diverse media and exploration of art practices
  • +Exceptional academic and personal support from invested professors
  • +Small class sizes and personalized instructor attention
  • +Nurturing and accessible learning community
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and interaction
  • +Strong academic support and post-graduation advantage
  • +Supportive instructors and engaging learning environment
  • +Diverse and welcoming international student community
  • +Valuable programs with practical experiences
Cons
  • -Underfunding of programs and limited course availability.
  • -Poor teaching quality and administrative issues in academic departments.
  • -Lack of responsiveness to student concerns and negative responses to activism.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management processes.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Disorganization and poor communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unsupportive instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -A perceived lack of support from staff and faculty is frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support create feelings of neglect.
Rating summary
What students say

Exhibiting a strong international profile, this university received its highest rating for Internationality at 4.34. Location also scored highly at 4.27, closely followed by Facilities at 4.24. Conversely, Student Life, with a rating of 3.98, and Accomodation, at 3.93, represent the areas with comparatively lower scores among the surveyed aspects.

Performance across surveyed categories reveals a well-rounded institution. Accommodation stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, student life received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other areas such as professors, internationality, and value all received strong marks, suggesting a positive overall experience for students.

This institution excels in core academic and infrastructural aspects, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and location. However, it faces significant challenges in student life and accommodation, both scoring zero. Internationality is rated moderately at three, while the overall value proposition is strong at four.

This institution demonstrates a commendable performance across its rated aspects. Facilities and Value emerge as its strongest points, both exceeding 4.3. Student Life, while still positive, receives the lowest score at approximately 4.13, indicating it as the comparative area for potential improvement. Other categories like Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality also score well within the 4.1 to 4.3 range.

This university shows exceptional strength in its academic offerings, with professors receiving a near-perfect rating. Location is also a well-regarded aspect. Areas needing improvement include facilities and student life, which received the lowest scores. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately well, alongside a decent internationality score.

This institution garners excellent marks across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect score. **Value** also stands out with a top rating. The university demonstrates strong performance in **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, each earning a solid 4. Accommodations also received a good rating of 4.

This institution garners exceptional scores for its **Facilities**, achieving a near-perfect 4.83. **Professors** and **Location** also score highly, both at 4.5, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life** and **Internationality**. **Value** is another significant strength at 4.67. The only area receiving a comparatively lower rating is **Accomodation**, standing at 3.8.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~96% of 109 reviews are positive, praising the supportive learning environment, faculty, and growth opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~4%) highlights concerns with course availability and program funding.

With ~88% positive feedback, students praise personable professors, engaging coursework, excellent facilities, and a vibrant campus atmosphere. Some note that lectures rely heavily on PowerPoints. No negative reviews were recorded.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with its programs being highly accessible and professors well-educated. Students appreciate the institution's attentiveness and dedication to their success.

With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 40 reviews, ~93% praise the welcoming community and small class sizes for strong professor and peer connections. No negative feedback was reported.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight access to diverse classes and instructors who are invested in personal growth and offer one-on-one support.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 rating. It highlights an amazing learning community, accessible professor-to-student ratio, and strong after-school advantages. There is no negative feedback.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 6 reviews, approximately 83% are highly positive. Students praise the friendly environment, diverse cultures, valuable programs, and supportive instructors, especially for international students. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
37%
12%
100%
50%
25%
100%
67%
4★
49%
77%
0%
38%
75%
0%
17%
3★
11%
12%
0%
13%
0%
0%
17%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Harassment, discrimination, assault.

Months before I was due to graduate, I faced harassment from two Physics and Astronomy department heads due to having a disability. I submitted a harassment complaint and instead of resolving the situation, the dean of the science faculty, the vice provost student experience and vice provost EDI retaliated and I had to deal with assault from an associate dean. The math courses, physics courses and computer science courses I took were universally poorly taught, and poorly administered. There is no support for students with disabilities and those who are othered are treated harshly and unfairly.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close