University of British Columbia vs Fairleigh Dickinson University - FDU vs Lighthouse Labs vs Emily Carr University of Art and Design - ECUAD vs LaSalle College Vancouver

Side-by-side comparison from 198 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tamwood International College (5.00)
University of British Columbia: wins 0/4 categories
Fairleigh Dickinson University - FDU: wins 0/4 categories
Lighthouse Labs: wins 0/4 categories
Emily Carr University of Art and Design - ECUAD: wins 0/4 categories
LaSalle College Vancouver: wins 0/4 categories
Tamwood International College: wins 4/4 categories
Canadian College: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Arts
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
4.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Vancouver, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Fashion Marketing and Communication
Best programme: Business and Management
Vancouver, Canada
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital and Social Media Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.33
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Location
4.45
4.33
Not rated
3.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.10
4.33
Not rated
3.00
3.50
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.35
4.67
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
3.00
Student life
4.31
3.67
Not rated
4.00
1.50
5.00
Win
3.00
Value
4.08
4.67
Not rated
4.00
3.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.86
4.00
Not rated
2.00
3.00
5.00
Win
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent academics and experienced faculty
  • +Valuable career preparation and practical learning
  • +Great campus resources and vibrant student life
  • +Exceptional faculty and engaging teaching methods
  • +Strong career preparation and real-world opportunities
  • +Positive atmosphere and supportive environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Experienced faculty and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and equipment
  • +Commitment to diversity and inclusion
  • +excellent, kind teachers and supportive co-op services
  • +strong international business program
  • +Engaging instructors and effective presentation skills development
  • +Foundational knowledge in social media campaign planning
  • +Desire for more practical, hands-on learning experiences
Cons
  • -Administrative and course selection issues are a significant frustration.
  • -Some professors and classes are subpar, with arbitrary grading.
  • -Social experiences outside of clubs can be disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
  • -The teaching quality and course content often fall short of expectations.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the administration.
  • -Inadequate facilities and resources, often feeling outdated.
  • -Overly demanding coursework and a lack of flexibility in learning.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Lack of clear communication
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a commendable performance across several key areas. Its strongest suit is location, achieving a high rating of 4.45. Student life and internationality also receive positive marks, both above 4.3. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.86. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value fall within a solid range, generally around the 4.0 to 4.2 mark.

This institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, notably Internationality and Value, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Location are also highly rated at 4.33. Student Life stands out as a comparatively weaker area, with a rating of 3.67. Accomodation also received a solid rating of 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners particularly strong ratings in **Internationality (5)**, indicating a well-developed global presence. **Facilities** and **Location** also score highly at 4. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, rated only 1.5. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** all sit in the mid-range, with scores of 3.5, 3, and 3.5 respectively.

This institution garners top marks in every assessed category, indicating exceptional performance. With perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no discernible weak areas. The university excels uniformly, presenting a consistently strong offering to its students.

This institution showcases a mixed but generally positive performance according to the provided ratings. It excels in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks of 5. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as a significant weakness with a rating of 1. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are rated moderately at 3, while Value is strong at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~83% positive reviews, students praise demanding academics, supportive resources, and career preparation. A small minority note challenges with course selection and professor engagement.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, students highlight excellent faculty, effective teaching methods like case studies and teamwork, and strong connections between academics and career opportunities. The university's atmosphere and location are also praised.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 based on two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight experienced faculty and modern facilities as key strengths. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights excellent and kind teachers and supportive services for international students.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), rating the program 4/5 stars. Students appreciated energetic instructors and found presentations helpful for public speaking and learning social media campaign planning fundamentals. Some noted a lack of job-readiness and need for more hands-on programs.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
67%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
50%
33%
0%
0%
100%
0%
100%
3★
12%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Underwhelming

I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

DIGITAL MARKETING

Pros Energetic instructors Gain the fundamental knowledge of social media campaign planning A LOT of presentations are helpful for public speaking Cons Not good enough to gain a job in marketing/social media Needs more hands-on programs or self-learning

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close