Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO vs Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL

Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/4 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 2/4 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 1/4 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/4 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 1/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
2.33
Not rated
4.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
4.63
5.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
3.88
5.00
Win
2.33
Not rated
3.00
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
2.67
Not rated
3.33
Value
Not rated
Not rated
4.63
Win
4.00
2.67
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
2.33
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.
  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
56%
100%
33%
0%
100%
4★
0%
0%
44%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close