Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA vs Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 1/3 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL: wins 2/3 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
3.50
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
3.33
Value
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Strong academic programs with qualified instructors and research opportunities.
  • +Practical learning experiences and updated course content.
  • +Accessible location and vibrant campus life.
  • +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
  • +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
  • +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **location** with a rating of 4.5. **Professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also received favorable scores of 4. The university's **internationality** is its weakest area, rated at 3. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.5, while the overall **value** is considered good at 4.

This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight qualified instructors, strong research promotion, and efforts to improve practical education. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
100%
33%
100%
0%
100%
4★
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close