Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Centro Colombo Americano vs Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES (5.00)
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO: wins 7/7 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/7 categories
Centro Colombo Americano: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.98
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.95
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.52
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
4.29
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.44
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.80
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Innovative programs with practical application and real-world projects
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors dedicated to student growth
  • +Comprehensive and ethical education fostering personal and professional development
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Inefficient administrative and communication issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum development is a significant concern.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

An overview of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Internationality and value are also rated very favorably. Facilities, location, and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weaker aspects of the university's offerings, scoring lower than other categories.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4.54/5 stars, reviews highlight an innovative and comprehensive education. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, practical projects, and opportunities for growth and international experiences.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
58%
100%
0%
0%
33%
0%
4★
0%
38%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
4%
0%
0%
100%
67%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close