Plekhanov Russian University of Economics vs University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad vs Tokyo Zokei University vs Kebbi State University of Science and Technology - KSUSTA vs Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic - WUFPBK

Side-by-side comparison from 8 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (4.30)
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics: wins 3/5 categories
University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad: wins 0/5 categories
Tokyo Zokei University: wins 0/5 categories
Kebbi State University of Science and Technology - KSUSTA: wins 0/5 categories
Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic - WUFPBK: wins 0/5 categories
ICT University - ICTU: wins 2/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Education Sciences
Best programme: Marketing
Yaounde, Cameroon
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
4.00
Location
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.00
3.00
Professors
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.50
4.00
Internationality
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
3.50
5.00
Value
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong marketing and management programs
  • +International opportunities and faculty support
  • +Active student life and modern facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive lecturers and academic environment
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and success
  • +Positive campus community and student integration
  • +Engaging lectures and supportive faculty
  • +Desire for more practical application alongside theory
  • +Flexible programs and excellent lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment
  • +Strong national recognition
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often unsatisfactory.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Inconsistent or poor administrative and management support is a major concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution causes frustration.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration and management create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities significantly detract from the learning environment.
  • -Overcrowded classes and a lack of individualized attention hinder academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support leave students feeling ignored.
Rating summary
What students say

Boasting excellent scores, the university excels in its facilities, location, and student life, all receiving a perfect five stars. However, areas for improvement are evident in professors, accommodation, and internationality, which all received a rating of approximately 3.67. Value is rated a solid four stars, indicating a generally positive perception of the institution.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student feedback reveals a university with considerable strengths, particularly in **Student Life**, which scored an impressive 4.5. **Professors** also received a solid rating of 4. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Location** garnered a respectable 3.5. The most modest scores were for **Accomodation** (3) and **Internationality** (3). **Value** for money was rated positively at 4.

This institution excels in **Value** and **Facilities**, receiving high marks in these key areas. Conversely, **Location**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** represent its comparatively weaker aspects, scoring a respectable but lower three out of five. **Professors** and **Student Life** fall within the middle range of performance.

This institution excels in several key areas, earning top marks for Student Life and Internationality. Value for money is also rated exceptionally high. Conversely, the university's accommodation offerings received the lowest possible score, indicating a significant area for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated positively, though not as outstandingly as student-focused aspects. Location received a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the program's deep knowledge, international opportunities, and attentive faculty, alongside an active student life. Some mention intense workload and occasional issues with subject sequencing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating, ~50% of reviews are positive. Positive feedback highlights helpful lecturers and a conducive study environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 3.5/5 average, reviews are mostly positive (~50%). One review highlighted great lectures and engaging teaching. There were no negative reviews.

This university receives positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight a flexible program, friendly lecturers, and a conducive learning environment. Some occasional LMS issues and high costs were noted.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
67%
0%
0%
50%
50%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close