Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL vs Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA: wins 1/1 categories
Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC: wins 0/1 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 0/1 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
4.20
4.20
5.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
5.00
3.40
3.80
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
4.60
4.17
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
3.20
3.00
3.00
2.00
5.00
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Win
4.00
4.20
3.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
5.00
4.40
4.50
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
3.60
3.00
5.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Prestigious reputation and quality education
  • +Professors' real-world marketing experience
  • +Enhanced career prospects and labor market opportunities
  • +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
  • +Excellent preparation for the labor market
  • +University prestige and history
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
  • +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
  • +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies
  • +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and in-demand programs
  • +Convenient campus access
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities are a common complaint.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across the board, this institution achieves outstanding marks, with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, there are no clear weakest areas to identify; every aspect surveyed received the highest possible rating, indicating a consistently strong performance. This suggests a well-rounded and highly desirable university experience.

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.

This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating ~100% positive sentiment. The positive feedback highlighted prestigious education and experienced marketing professors.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
83%
43%
100%
100%
100%
0%
4★
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
17%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close