Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA vs Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA: wins 0/0 categories
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/0 categories
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 0/0 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/0 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 0/0 categories
Universidad Libre - UniLibre: wins 0/0 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Not rated
4.20
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
5.00
Not rated
4.80
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
5.00
3.50
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
5.00
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Prestigious reputation and quality education
  • +Professors' real-world marketing experience
  • +Enhanced career prospects and labor market opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation

Nothing to show

  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.
  • +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
  • +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
  • +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities are a common complaint.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations cause frustration.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across the board, this institution achieves outstanding marks, with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, there are no clear weakest areas to identify; every aspect surveyed received the highest possible rating, indicating a consistently strong performance. This suggests a well-rounded and highly desirable university experience.

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

Nothing to show

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating ~100% positive sentiment. The positive feedback highlighted prestigious education and experienced marketing professors.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
40%
0%
100%
33%
0%
4★
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
67%
0%
3★
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close