International Islamic University, Islamabad vs Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs National University of Modern Languages vs Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST vs Allama Iqbal Open University

Side-by-side comparison from 87 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology (5.00)
International Islamic University, Islamabad: wins 1/7 categories
Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Modern Languages: wins 4/7 categories
Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST: wins 0/7 categories
Allama Iqbal Open University: wins 1/7 categories
Air University Islamabad: wins 0/7 categories
Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Statistics
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: English Literature and Linguistics
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Applied Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition
Islamabad, Pakistan
4.10
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: AI and Data Management
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
3.69
4.08
Win
4.00
3.25
4.00
3.00
Location
4.65
4.13
4.83
Win
3.17
4.67
4.25
4.00
Professors
4.16
4.44
4.42
4.17
4.50
4.33
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.04
3.25
4.23
3.50
4.75
Win
3.33
4.00
Student life
3.96
4.07
4.28
Win
3.83
4.25
3.78
4.00
Value
3.84
3.75
4.42
Win
3.83
4.25
4.11
2.00
Accommodation
4.24
Win
2.63
3.92
3.17
3.33
3.22
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and dedicated faculty
  • +Enriching curriculum and academic growth
  • +Diverse community and shared values
  • +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
  • +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
  • +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.
  • +High-quality faculty and teaching methods
  • +Strong academic programs with relevant and up-to-date content
  • +Supportive learning environment and flexible schedules
  • +Academic quality and supportive faculty
  • +Diverse, accredited programs and flexible learning
  • +Scholarships and valuable soft skills development
  • +Flexible study options for work and home
  • +Responsive tutors and timely feedback
  • +High-quality, relevant academic syllabus
  • +Cooperative faculty & student-centric feedback
  • +Practical, real-world application of learning
  • +Strong, modern curriculum with specialized programs
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty
  • +Balanced curriculum with practical application
  • +Positive academic environment and skill development opportunities
Cons
  • -Poor quality of teaching, outdated curriculum, and lack of concept clarity.
  • -Negative faculty attitudes and administrative issues like favoritism.
  • -Unsafe or problematic hostel environment.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
  • -Unfair grading, favoritism, and unprofessional/rude teacher and staff conduct.
  • -Lack of transparency in internal evaluations.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Communication gaps lead to confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a major concern.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

The university garners positive marks across several aspects, with location standing out as its strongest feature. Student life, though generally good, received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Facilities and internationality are rated similarly well, while professors and accommodation also score favorably. The value proposition is also a notable area for consideration.

Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.

This institution garners impressive marks, particularly excelling in **location**, receiving the highest score. **Professors** and **value** also stand out with strong ratings. Conversely, **accommodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting areas for potential improvement within student living arrangements. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with a few standout strengths.

This institution presents a generally positive profile with notable strengths in its facilities and professors, both receiving ratings of 4 and above. Student life and value also score well. Conversely, location and accommodation appear to be areas for improvement, with the lowest ratings. Internationality is moderately rated.

This institution showcases exceptional strengths in its **location (4.67)** and **internationality (4.75)**, indicating a highly desirable and globally connected environment. **Professors (4.5)** also receive very high marks. Conversely, **facilities (3.25)** and **accommodation (3.33)** are areas where the university's performance is comparatively lower, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. Other areas like student life and value fall within a positive range.

Academically and experientially, the university receives strong marks. Professors are highly rated at 4.33, closely followed by location at 4.25 and value at 4.11. Facilities also score well with a 4. Student life, while decent at 3.78, is a relative area for improvement, and accommodation at 3.22 and internationality at 3.33 are the lowest-scoring aspects.

This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its assessed strengths and weaknesses. Professors receive the highest commendation, scoring a perfect 5. Conversely, accommodation is the weakest area, rated at a low 2. The university also scores well in location, student life, and internationality, all achieving a 4. Facilities are moderately rated at 3, while the value proposition also received a lower score of 2.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting transformative academic and personal growth, supportive faculty, and a diverse community. Some negative feedback, around 16%, mentions issues like outdated courses and faculty concerns.

With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.

University reviews are predominantly positive (~96%), highlighting knowledgeable faculty, high-quality education, and a supportive learning environment. A small minority (~4%) expressed concerns about biased grading and unprofessional staff behavior.

With a 4.83/5 average from 6 reviews, ~0% negative feedback is noted. Students praise modern facilities, flexible options, and accredited programs. Academic strength, supportive faculty, and scholarships are frequently highlighted.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with students praising accessible study materials, responsive tutors, and a flexible study system. Graduates also report strong employment prospects.

With ~89% positive sentiment, students praise cooperative faculty and practical learning, highlighting opportunities for academic and personal growth. A small amount of feedback (~11%) did not contain negative comments.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, the sole review highlights a very positive experience. Strengths mentioned include well-structured courses, knowledgeable and supportive professors, and a strong academic environment.

Rating distribution
5★
40%
31%
50%
83%
75%
33%
100%
4★
28%
44%
46%
17%
25%
44%
0%
3★
16%
25%
0%
0%
0%
22%
0%
2★
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A great experience

I've completed my bachelor's degree in IIUI , and I think it was a great experience for me. Especially professors are really nice a d professional in class. They do their best to give the most relevant information to the students. The department stuff and teachers are kind and friendly. They don't have class issues, they are really helpful. I'd really a great experience with my department which is language and literature. There always had an event such as presentations about great writers , poem sessions which were my favourite. The only issue I have experienced there was with the administration office because documents take really long time and need a strong patient. But rest was good. İf you get chance to study there I'd suggest you to take that chance. Best of luck.

Nothing to show

NUML

Numl is one of the best universities in Pakistan. Numl is also internationally recognised. It provides quality education and great sports, library, and scholarship facilities to its students. NUML has good faculty and administration.

Nothing to show

library

My experience with Allama Iqbal Open University (AIOU) Islamabad has been truly remarkable. The university offers a highly flexible study system, which is ideal for students who are working or have other responsibilities. The distance learning method is well-structured and enables students to gain quality education from home without compromising on standards. The tutors were extremely supportive, always providing timely feedback on assignments, which helped me improve continuously. Online workshops and tutorials made it easier to understand complex concepts. The study materials were well-organized, comprehensive, and delivered on time every semester. AIOU’s Learning Management System (LMS) is user-friendly and allows easy access to assignments, announcements, and results. The examination system is fair and transparent, ensuring merit-based assessment. Moreover, the degree is highly valued both nationally and internationally, making it a strong foundation for career growth. Overall, AIOU helped me build self-confidence, develop time management skills, and become an independent learner. It is the perfect choice for anyone seeking flexible, affordable, and quality education. I highly recommend AIOU to every student who wants to brighten their future while balancing other commitments. last i have completed master in lis from allama iqbal open university islamabad pakistan recently 2025

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close