Dr. José Matías Delgado University - UJMD vs Catholic Lisbon School of Business and Economics vs HTL International School vs CIELS BOLOGNA vs Universidade Federal de Ciências de Saúde de Porto Alegre

Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: CIELS BOLOGNA (4.50)
Dr. José Matías Delgado University - UJMD: wins 2/6 categories
Catholic Lisbon School of Business and Economics: wins 2/6 categories
HTL International School: wins 0/6 categories
CIELS BOLOGNA: wins 2/6 categories
Universidade Federal de Ciências de Saúde de Porto Alegre: wins 0/6 categories
Sudan University for Science and Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Alte University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Bologna, Italy
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Mediation
Best programme: Architecture
Tbilisi, Georgia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.05
Win
3.21
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
4.25
3.79
4.50
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.30
3.60
4.50
Win
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
4.15
3.67
4.50
Win
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Win
3.79
3.21
4.50
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.15
Win
3.33
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.45
3.14
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Comprehensive education with hands-on professional practices
  • +Essential knowledge and skills for successful careers
  • +In-depth understanding and real-world experience
  • +High-quality teaching and qualified, experienced faculty
  • +Strong academic reputation and rigorous programs
  • +Supportive learning environment and flexibility
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
  • +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
  • +Effective teaching methods and practical application
  • +Personalized and supportive learning environment
  • +Skill development and personal growth
  • +Ideal campus location and atmosphere

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging lectures and active student community
  • +Extensive social events and party scene
  • +Accessible educational support

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking depth.
  • -Misleading program length and content
  • -Poor organization and administrative issues
  • -Invalid certificates and waste of money
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support hinders learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly excelling in its prime location and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded educational experience. However, internationality stands out as a weaker area, scoring lower than other assessed aspects.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors received a very high rating (4.3), closely followed by location (4.25) and internationality and value (both 4.15). Facilities also scored well at 4.05. The area with the lowest score is accommodation, at 3.45, indicating room for improvement in this aspect. Student life, while solid, falls slightly behind other metrics at 3.79.

This institution's strengths lie in its **Location**, scoring a notable 3.79, and its **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** (3.6) and **Value** (3.33). Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest marks at 3.14, with **Facilities** and **Student Life** also in the lower range (both 3.21).

This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance, excelling particularly in its professors, location, student life, and internationality, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. The university also scores well in facilities and value, with a solid 4. Accommodation also achieves a respectable 4. Notably, there are no significantly weak areas identified, with all ratings at 4 or above.

Nothing to show

This institution received its highest marks for student life, boasting a rating of 3.33. Other areas, such as location and internationality, also performed reasonably well with scores of 2.67. Conversely, the university's weakest areas were facilities and accommodation, both receiving a rating of 2. The value proposition for students was rated at a solid 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate a highly positive experience (~50% positive). Students praise comprehensive education, essential skills, and valuable real-world experience through hands-on practices.

With a 4.35/5 average rating from 20 reviews, approximately 95% are positive. Students praise academic reputation, qualified faculty, and supportive learning environments. No negative reviews were submitted.

Around 67% of reviews are positive, praising the strong knowledge and professionalism gained. However, about 33% are negative, citing concerns about organization, program duration, and communication.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight personal growth, improved skills, and a supportive learning environment with small class sizes and direct teacher interaction.

Nothing to show

With a 3.33/5 average, ~33% of feedback is positive. One reviewer found education good but mentioned varying doctor quality, long lectures, and many parties. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
40%
47%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
55%
20%
50%
0%
33%
0%
3★
50%
5%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Academic Experience

Dr. José Matías Delgado University proved to be an exceptional choice for my professional studies. The comprehensive education I received equipped me with the essential knowledge and skills required for a successful career. The curriculum was enhanced by hands-on professional practices, which provided me with valuable real-world experience across various fields. This practical approach facilitated the development of a significant and in-depth understanding of the subjects, thoroughly preparing me for the professional world.

Nothing to show

Do not recomend at all

Ive had so many problems with this school>tehy just care about money , after you get in barcelonna even information they just give it if you pay like 200 euros . than the classes> they say you have the option to study online or Presencial but the presential the techer is on her house so it is also online. you dont get any presencial class. aldo if the teacher is in the school she is the same person as the receptionist, the cordiator and director of the course. Classes were poorly organized, with minimal academic content*( if you had any kind of study about the theme you know they dont say anything) and a strong lack of structure. Many subjects were rushed or skipped, and there was little to no real academic guidance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close