Dr. José Matías Delgado University - UJMD vs Catholic Lisbon School of Business and Economics vs HTL International School vs CIELS BOLOGNA vs Universidade Federal de Ciências de Saúde de Porto Alegre
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Comprehensive education with hands-on professional practices
- +Essential knowledge and skills for successful careers
- +In-depth understanding and real-world experience
- +High-quality teaching and qualified, experienced faculty
- +Strong academic reputation and rigorous programs
- +Supportive learning environment and flexibility
- +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
- +Effective teaching methods and practical application
- +Personalized and supportive learning environment
- +Skill development and personal growth
- +Ideal campus location and atmosphere
Nothing to show
- +Engaging lectures and active student community
- +Extensive social events and party scene
- +Accessible educational support
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking depth.
- -Misleading program length and content
- -Poor organization and administrative issues
- -Invalid certificates and waste of money
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of essential resources and support hinders learning.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly excelling in its prime location and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded educational experience. However, internationality stands out as a weaker area, scoring lower than other assessed aspects.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors received a very high rating (4.3), closely followed by location (4.25) and internationality and value (both 4.15). Facilities also scored well at 4.05. The area with the lowest score is accommodation, at 3.45, indicating room for improvement in this aspect. Student life, while solid, falls slightly behind other metrics at 3.79.
This institution's strengths lie in its **Location**, scoring a notable 3.79, and its **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** (3.6) and **Value** (3.33). Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest marks at 3.14, with **Facilities** and **Student Life** also in the lower range (both 3.21).
This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance, excelling particularly in its professors, location, student life, and internationality, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. The university also scores well in facilities and value, with a solid 4. Accommodation also achieves a respectable 4. Notably, there are no significantly weak areas identified, with all ratings at 4 or above.
Nothing to show
This institution received its highest marks for student life, boasting a rating of 3.33. Other areas, such as location and internationality, also performed reasonably well with scores of 2.67. Conversely, the university's weakest areas were facilities and accommodation, both receiving a rating of 2. The value proposition for students was rated at a solid 3.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate a highly positive experience (~50% positive). Students praise comprehensive education, essential skills, and valuable real-world experience through hands-on practices.
With a 4.35/5 average rating from 20 reviews, approximately 95% are positive. Students praise academic reputation, qualified faculty, and supportive learning environments. No negative reviews were submitted.
Around 67% of reviews are positive, praising the strong knowledge and professionalism gained. However, about 33% are negative, citing concerns about organization, program duration, and communication.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight personal growth, improved skills, and a supportive learning environment with small class sizes and direct teacher interaction.
Nothing to show
With a 3.33/5 average, ~33% of feedback is positive. One reviewer found education good but mentioned varying doctor quality, long lectures, and many parties. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
Dr. José Matías Delgado University proved to be an exceptional choice for my professional studies. The comprehensive education I received equipped me with the essential knowledge and skills required for a successful career. The curriculum was enhanced by hands-on professional practices, which provided me with valuable real-world experience across various fields. This practical approach facilitated the development of a significant and in-depth understanding of the subjects, thoroughly preparing me for the professional world.
Nothing to show
Ive had so many problems with this school>tehy just care about money , after you get in barcelonna even information they just give it if you pay like 200 euros . than the classes> they say you have the option to study online or Presencial but the presential the techer is on her house so it is also online. you dont get any presencial class. aldo if the teacher is in the school she is the same person as the receptionist, the cordiator and director of the course. Classes were poorly organized, with minimal academic content*( if you had any kind of study about the theme you know they dont say anything) and a strong lack of structure. Many subjects were rushed or skipped, and there was little to no real academic guidance.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show