Azerbaijan State University of Economics vs Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University vs Azerbaijan Technical University vs Odlar Yurdu University vs Baku State University

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Odlar Yurdu University (5.00)
Azerbaijan State University of Economics: wins 1/7 categories
Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University: wins 4/7 categories
Azerbaijan Technical University: wins 0/7 categories
Odlar Yurdu University: wins 2/7 categories
Baku State University: wins 0/7 categories
Khazar University - KHU: wins 0/7 categories
Western Caspian University - WCU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Finance
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Baku, Azerbaijan
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Language for Intercultural Communication
Best programme: International Affairs
Baku, Azerbaijan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.86
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.71
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.57
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
3.29
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.50
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.71
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.14
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.43
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert faculty and quality education in economics, marketing, management, and IT
  • +Supportive community and opportunities for skill development and career advancement
  • +Vibrant student life and enjoyable campus environment
  • +Strong technical and English-language engineering programs
  • +Opportunities for collaborative projects
  • +Improved practical and real-world learning experiences

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive professors and practical learning experiences.
  • +Strong academic foundation in English Language Teaching.
  • +Strong theoretical knowledge and knowledgeable academic staff.
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with important global topics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources frustrate students.
  • -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum design are major complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of student support and feedback is a significant concern.
  • -Lack of administrative and management support.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Insufficient resources and opportunities for learning.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With excellent scores for location and student life, this institution shines in these aspects. Professors also received a very strong rating. However, accommodation and internationality present areas with comparatively lower scores. Facilities are rated moderately, while value for money is considered good.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic and living environments. Professors and accommodation both received perfect scores, indicating high quality in teaching and student housing. Student life and internationality also scored highly, suggesting a vibrant and diverse campus experience. Facilities were rated well, but the location received a score of zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. Overall, the university offers strong value.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key aspects, with outstanding ratings for **Location** and **Internationality**. Student life and professors also receive strong marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The primary area of concern, however, is **Accommodation**, which received the lowest possible score. The value proposition and facilities are rated positively, suggesting a generally favorable offering.

A university's strengths lie in its excellent **Location** (4.5) and highly-regarded **Professors** (4) and **Student Life** (4). Areas with room for improvement include **Facilities** (3) and **Accomodation** (3.5), though these still receive adequate scores. Internationality and value for money are also well-rated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 4.57/5 stars. Students highlight excellent faculty expertise, strong career support, and engaging campus life. Some suggest improvements for campus housing.

With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights strong technical engineering education in English and collaborative project opportunities. Some desire for more practical, real-world application in courses exists.

Nothing to show

This university has received one 5-star review, indicating a highly positive experience. The student highlighted a strong academic program, supportive professors, and practical experience opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.

With one positive review, students highlight strong theoretical knowledge and knowledgeable staff. The primary criticism (~50%) is the lack of practical training and real-world application.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
57%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
43%
100%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close