University of Debrecen vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Budapest Metropolitan University vs University of Miskolc
Side-by-side comparison from 158 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Approachable and invested lecturers
- +Well-structured, engaging programmes with practical application
- +International environment and community building
- +Strong academic programmes and learning support
- +Approachable and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive international student environment
- +High-quality, practical education with specialized pathways.
- +Supportive, close-knit learning environment and friendly atmosphere.
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous enriching activities and social connections.
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
- +Internationalization and cultural diversity
- +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
- +Affordable, international study environment
- +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
- +Engaging instructors and inspiring teaching
- +Relevant and practical curriculum
- +Excellent career support and opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant stress.
- -Lack of teacher support and career counseling hinders student progress.
- -Study quality is often poor, especially in non-medical fields.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Poor quality and preparedness of professors
- -Lack of relevance in courses and teaching
- -Ineffective organization and management
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Poor English proficiency of some professors hinders learning.
- -Lack of student support and care is a significant concern.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across most aspects. Internationality stands out as a particularly high-scoring area, reflecting a well-developed global presence. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Other areas like facilities, student life, and professors also received favorable scores, indicating a generally positive university experience.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across several key areas. Student Life is a clear standout, achieving the highest rating. Professors and Internationality also receive strong marks. However, Accommodations present the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Facilities, Location, and Value fall within the generally positive range.
This institution excels in its **location**, receiving the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. However, **accommodation** presents the weakest area, with a lower score compared to other aspects. The university demonstrates a solid standing in facilities and professors, with value also scoring respectably.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.
This institution excels in its accommodation facilities, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities, location, and value for money, all scoring a low 1. Professors, student life, and internationality received moderate ratings of 2, indicating these aspects are neither a strong suit nor a major weakness.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting beautiful buildings, friendly lecturers, and a diverse international community. A small percentage (~4%) express concerns about academic support and specific program quality.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~84% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the diverse faculties, excellent library, and strong support for international students. There are no 1-2 star reviews.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good knowledge transfer, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. A small portion (~8%) of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.
~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.
This university has received one review, which is negative. The student rated it 1 out of 5 stars, citing unprofessionalism, poor program management, and English language difficulties among some professors.
The university offers a strong academic foundation with well-structured courses and a wide range of modules to choose from. I appreciated the flexibility of the programme, which allowed me to explore my interests while still gaining core knowledge in my field. Lecturers were approachable and genuinely invested in students’ growth, and the academic support available was excellent. However, I found that some courses were a bit too theoretical and would have benefited from more hands-on or industry-relevant components. Despite that, the overall environment encouraged self-discipline, curiosity, and collaboration. I would recommend this university to students who are self-motivated and eager to take ownership of their learning journey.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.
Nothing to show
