King's Own Institute - KOI vs Torrens University Australia vs University of New England vs University of Sydney Business School vs Learning People
Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality education and real-world relevant course content
- +Friendly and caring teachers and staff
- +Engaging and interactive classes with knowledgeable and passionate professors
- +Flexible learning options catering to working students
- +Practical, real-world experience emphasized
- +Flexible and accessible online learning options
- +High-quality academic programs and experienced faculty
- +Supportive student services and community focus
- +Inclusive and welcoming environment
- +Creative and interesting teaching methodologies
- +Diverse student body and cultural exposure
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Practical skills and engaging, interactive sessions
- +Strong advocacy and applied learning focus
- +Welcoming faculty and accessible learning resources
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues like course changes and unclear enrollment practices.
- -High costs and questionable value for money regarding tuition fees.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and potentially rude or untrained facilitators.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
- -Poor communication and disorganized administration cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder learning.
- -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some instructors lacking expertise.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and feedback is a recurring problem.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, with particularly strong showings in Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving four out of five stars. Areas that received solid, though slightly lower, ratings include Facilities, Professors, Location, and Accommodations, each scoring 3.5. This indicates a generally positive experience, with some aspects standing out more than others.
This institution demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the area requiring the most attention, with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated similarly and fall in the mid-range. Accomodation and Internationality also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores compared to the strongest category.
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, with Facilities being the standout at 4.45. Professors and Student Life also receive favorable scores, alongside a solid rating for Value. Conversely, Internationality presents the lowest rating at 3.86, indicating a potential area for growth. Accommodations and Location also fall slightly below the highest-rated aspects.
This university garners exceptional marks for its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring a high 4.6. **Facilities** also received a strong rating at 4.4. Conversely, **Value** emerged as the lowest-scoring area, rated at 3.8. Other aspects like Professors and Student Life are well-regarded at 4.2, while Accommodation sits at a solid 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, with exceptional marks awarded for its professors (5/5). Student life also scores highly, at 4.33. Conversely, the university's location and internationality are areas with the lowest ratings, scoring 3.5 and 3.33 respectively. Other aspects like facilities, accommodation, and value all received solid marks of 4.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight excellent quality education, friendly staff, and courses relevant to the real world.
~63% of reviews are positive, praising flexible learning, passionate professors, and engaging classes. ~37.5% of feedback is negative, citing course changes and high costs.
With a 4.24/5 average rating from 21 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, flexible remote/in-person options, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.
All five reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.6/5. Recurring themes include an inclusive and welcoming environment, creative teaching methods, and diverse student body. Some noted expensive living costs and occasional unhelpful core units.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Reviews are highly positive (~100% of feedback), with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-organized programs, practical knowledge, and engaging facilitators. Advocacy skill practice and international accreditation are also highlighted as strengths.
Nothing to show
I want to share my experience with Torrens University. They initially gave me an offer letter and Confirmation of Enrollment (COE), but after I had been in the course for a year, they changed the name of the course and added more subjects to my study plan. It really feels like Torrens is using this format to make more money from students. This kind of practice is frustrating and makes it hard for us to plan our studies effectively.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show