King's Own Institute - KOI vs Charles Sturt University vs Torrens University Australia vs University of New England vs Learning People
Side-by-side comparison from 78 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality education and real-world relevant course content
- +Friendly and caring teachers and staff
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Engaging and diverse academic programs
- +Positive campus environment and growth opportunities
- +Engaging and interactive classes with knowledgeable and passionate professors
- +Flexible learning options catering to working students
- +Practical, real-world experience emphasized
- +Flexible and accessible online learning options
- +High-quality academic programs and experienced faculty
- +Supportive student services and community focus
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and personalized learning environment with engaged lecturers
- +Valuable real-world experience through integrated internships
- +Diverse and multicultural student community offering unique global connections
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are significant complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues like course changes and unclear enrollment practices.
- -High costs and questionable value for money regarding tuition fees.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and potentially rude or untrained facilitators.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and a lack of clear communication are significant problems.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, with particularly strong showings in Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving four out of five stars. Areas that received solid, though slightly lower, ratings include Facilities, Professors, Location, and Accommodations, each scoring 3.5. This indicates a generally positive experience, with some aspects standing out more than others.
This institution demonstrates particular strength in its faculty, earning the highest rating for professors. Student life and value for money also received commendable scores. Conversely, facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other categories, including location, accommodation, and internationality, show solid, mid-range performance.
This institution demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the area requiring the most attention, with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated similarly and fall in the mid-range. Accomodation and Internationality also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores compared to the strongest category.
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, with Facilities being the standout at 4.45. Professors and Student Life also receive favorable scores, alongside a solid rating for Value. Conversely, Internationality presents the lowest rating at 3.86, indicating a potential area for growth. Accommodations and Location also fall slightly below the highest-rated aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Exceptional scores are evident across multiple aspects of the university. The institution excels in Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving perfect marks. Value is also rated a perfect 5. Conversely, while still strong, the weakest area identified is Professor ratings, just shy of a perfect score at 4.5.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight excellent quality education, friendly staff, and courses relevant to the real world.
With 41 out of 45 reviews being positive, students praise knowledgeable professors and supportive faculty. They highlight growth opportunities, challenging curricula, and vibrant campus life. There is no negative feedback in the provided sample.
~63% of reviews are positive, praising flexible learning, passionate professors, and engaging classes. ~37.5% of feedback is negative, citing course changes and high costs.
With a 4.24/5 average rating from 21 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, flexible remote/in-person options, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight feeling supported, personalized attention from lecturers, valuable internship opportunities, and a beautiful campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I want to share my experience with Torrens University. They initially gave me an offer letter and Confirmation of Enrollment (COE), but after I had been in the course for a year, they changed the name of the course and added more subjects to my study plan. It really feels like Torrens is using this format to make more money from students. This kind of practice is frustrating and makes it hard for us to plan our studies effectively.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
