Universidad Icesi vs Universidad de Carabobo - UC vs Universidad Autónoma de Baja California - UABC vs Universidad José Antonio Páez - UJAP vs Oral Roberts University

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Icesi: wins 1/4 categories
Universidad de Carabobo - UC: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California - UABC: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad José Antonio Páez - UJAP: wins 1/4 categories
Oral Roberts University: wins 0/4 categories
Marbella International University Centre: wins 1/4 categories
Federal Polytechnic Bauchi - FPTB: wins 1/4 categories
Comparing
Cali, Colombia
3.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Pharmaceutical Chemistry
Best programme: Dentistry
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Dentistry
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Social Media
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
3.50
4.75
4.48
Not rated
4.00
3.67
Location
4.00
3.67
3.75
4.15
Not rated
4.50
4.50
Professors
4.00
4.33
3.25
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.67
Internationality
1.00
3.33
4.00
2.95
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Student life
4.00
3.67
5.00
4.68
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Value
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.18
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
Accommodation
4.00
2.67
2.75
3.48
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Active learning model for competent professionals
  • +Excellent campus and national recognition
  • +High-quality education with good learning labs
  • +Excellent professors and quality teaching
  • +Good campus facilities and activities
  • +Strong academic programs and ethical training
  • +Wide variety of strong programs and research focus
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment fostering personal growth
  • +Dedicated and well-trained faculty creating a family atmosphere
  • +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities, including labs
  • +Strong connection between academics and practical/work fields

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive instructors and practical experience opportunities
  • +Clear, straightforward content and engaging subject matter
  • +Network growth and career support
  • +Excellent quality of education and impactful learning.
  • +Diverse programs and experienced faculty.
  • +Respectful and inclusive environment with friendly professors.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engagement are problems.
  • -Administrative & management issues.
  • -Lack of resources and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of company agreements and resulting limited career opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and irrelevant by many.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently mentioned.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students causes dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

Outstanding facilities are a key strength of this institution, receiving a perfect score. Areas such as professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value also performed well, each earning a solid 4 out of 5. The university's weakest area is internationality, with a significantly lower rating of 1, indicating a considerable opportunity for improvement in this aspect.

The university exhibits a strong valuation of 4, with professors receiving a notable 4.33. Student life and location are also well-regarded at 3.67. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, scoring a 2.67, while facilities and internationality fall within the mid-range. Overall, this institution offers a good balance, excelling in academic and student engagement aspects but facing challenges with housing.

This university garners exceptionally high marks for Student Life, achieving a perfect score. Its Facilities also stand out with a rating of 4.75. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest rating at 2.75, suggesting room for improvement in this area. Professors' ratings are a mid-range 3.25, while Location, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid 3.75 to 4.5 range.

Examining university ratings reveals a highly regarded institution. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors (4.75) and Student Life (4.675), indicating excellent academic instruction and vibrant campus activities. Facilities and Location also score well. However, Accomodation (3.475) and particularly Internationality (2.95) present areas for improvement. The overall Value (4.175) suggests a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

This institution receives high marks, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a perfect score of 5. **Professors** and **Location** are also highly regarded, both earning 4.5. While most areas demonstrate solid performance, **Accomodation** stands out as the comparatively weaker aspect, receiving a rating of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with exceptional global appeal.

This institution receives high marks across most aspects, notably excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Professors and Value are also strong performers, both rated highly. Accommodation is well-regarded, and Internationality scores are positive. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, which received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~67% of feedback being positive, students praise an active learning model and a recognized, extensive campus with good labs. Some find the active learning challenging, with quality dependent on professor guidance.

University reviews are predominantly positive (~86%), highlighting academic excellence, great professors, and good facilities. A small amount of feedback (~14%) notes a need for improved maintenance.

With an average rating of 4.11/5 from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students praise quality education, diverse programs, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) cites issues with discontinued subjects and limited company agreements affecting graduate opportunities.

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.2/5. Recurring themes highlight excellent teachers, a complete curriculum, and good facilities. Some suggest incorporating more practical, work-field-linked programs and improved computer lab installations.

Nothing to show

With 100% positive sentiment, students highlight numerous networking and practical experience opportunities. They praise clear, straightforward program content and supportive instructors offering assistance with assignments and career development.

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the quality of education, diverse programs, and experienced faculty, with ~100% positive feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
57%
33%
20%
0%
100%
100%
4★
67%
29%
56%
80%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
14%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

The University of Carabobo a good option to consider

The University of Carabobo is an excellent place to consider to study higher education. In addition, it is one of the main institutions of university education with the highest demand in the State of Carabobo, as a student of the Faculty of Engineering, I think that it is one of the best Faculties has a great demand for its educational excellence. The UC is a good option to consider for all those who wish to study higher education in Venezuela. As in every institution there will always be things to improve and perfect, I mean in terms of infrastructure in the case of the Faculty of Engineering.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close