Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM vs Universidad Interamericana para el Desarrollo - UNID vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana campus Azcapotzalco - UAM AZCAPOTZALCO

Side-by-side comparison from 124 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana campus Azcapotzalco - UAM AZCAPOTZALCO (5.00)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Interamericana para el Desarrollo - UNID: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana campus Azcapotzalco - UAM AZCAPOTZALCO : wins 5/7 categories
UCAD University - UCAD : wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Mexicano de Psicooncología - IMPo: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Arts and Sciences
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Mexico City, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.98
3.50
4.53
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.23
3.50
4.49
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.31
3.20
4.42
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.09
2.20
4.58
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.21
3.00
4.63
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.41
3.20
4.58
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.24
2.25
4.64
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Inspirational and experienced professors
  • +Diverse student body and learning environment
  • +Relevant programs and strong academic reputation
  • +Personalized attention and accessible learning environment
  • +High quality teaching from knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Innovative programs and focus on student development
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive economics curriculum with diverse perspectives
  • +Pleasant campus environment and well-stocked library
  • +Accessible location with good transportation options

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Limited student support and resources beyond the library.
  • -Overcrowded classes hinder personalized teacher attention.
  • -Lack of evolution and progress within the classroom environment.
  • -Poor academic quality and lack of support from staff.
  • -Unrealistic expectations and inconsiderate policies for students.
  • -Lack of professionalism and knowledge from some teachers.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives particularly strong scores for **Value**, its **Professors**, and **Location**. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. The weakest area of the university appears to be **Accomodation**, which received a notably lower rating compared to other aspects surveyed. Facilities also scored moderately.

Analysis of these university ratings reveals a mixed picture. The strongest areas include **Facilities**, scoring 3.55, and **Location** at 3.5. **Professors** and **Value** also received respectable scores around 3.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.125) and **Internationality** (2.08) present the most significant areas for improvement, alongside **Student Life** at 2.875.

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

Nothing to show

This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, and value all received perfect marks, indicating exceptional strengths in these domains. Facilities and internationality were also highly rated, though slightly less so than the top-scoring categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong offering in its student experience and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews are positive (~87%), praising professors and academic quality. A small percentage (~4%) note overcrowded classes and limited student support.

~74% of students provide positive feedback, praising personalized attention and good teachers. However, ~28.6% of feedback expresses concerns about slow administration and inconsistent teacher quality.

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise the academic program's broad scope, accessible transportation, and pleasant campus environment. There is no negative feedback to report.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
52%
57%
62%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
35%
14%
35%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
9%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Worst option, awful professors and service

If you are thinking about signing up here, I recommend that you better look for a serious university and not a duckling like this one. I tell you my experience: Of the teachers I had since the first semester, I can tell you that 3 are salvable, from then on the others leave much to be desired, from lack of professionalism to lack of knowledge about the subject they "taught". They are excellent collectors and they worry a lot because you pay in advance. They send you emails, SMS, WhatsApp, but when it comes to important information, like when your group is no longer profitable and you will have to take classes if you want with another career or to let you know that I do not know who happened to have 5 hours of a subject with only one teacher at a time is a good idea when you have 6 semesters there ... For that there is nothing, no emails, calls, WhatsApp, absolutely nothing. The truth is, if you enter this university, you must be ready to how badly they'll treat you, won't follow up, will make changes without notifying you, won't consult you, will lie constantly and won't look you in the eyes ... The last thing was that I asked for my monthly reimbursement since they never gave us an option that will work for us and that my transcript of matters has no cost to me since they were the ones who did not fulfill their part of the deal and Reyna dares to lie, saying that I would pass my leave, complaint, and request ... It never did, it took 3 weeks without a solution. Today I finally spoke with someone else and I hope to have my leave and papers soon. And if they do not return my money, I hope they ask their God to forgive them for all the ball of lies they say because on earth they are going to turn off. In the end, do not waste your money and time, it's not worth it.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close