Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM vs TIAS School for Business and Society vs National Chiao Tung University vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Deree Graduate Education

Side-by-side comparison from 105 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM: wins 0/2 categories
TIAS School for Business and Society: wins 1/2 categories
National Chiao Tung University: wins 0/2 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/2 categories
Deree Graduate Education: wins 1/2 categories
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University - NYCU: wins 0/2 categories
Faculty of Law, University of Lisbon - FDUL: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Actuarial Mathematics
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: MA in Learning Design and Technology – Online
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.06
5.00
5.00
4.40
4.73
4.00
3.00
Location
4.28
5.00
4.00
4.70
4.83
3.00
5.00
Professors
4.33
5.00
5.00
4.60
4.56
5.00
1.00
Internationality
4.11
5.00
Win
4.00
4.60
4.63
4.00
3.00
Student life
4.30
2.00
4.00
3.90
4.73
Win
4.00
3.00
Value
4.44
5.00
5.00
3.90
4.75
4.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.30
2.00
5.00
3.00
4.50
5.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Inspiring professors and professional growth
  • +Diverse academic programs and relevant careers
  • +Vibrant campus life and friendly community
  • +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Engaging professors and insightful discussions
  • +Diverse student body and collaborative learning opportunities.
  • +Merged programs offering strong technological and medical expertise.
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +High-quality, engaging programs with a balance of theory and practice
  • +Excellent faculty with practical experience and research expertise
  • +Supportive community and seamless institutional infrastructure
  • +Scenic and well-equipped campus facilities
  • +Highly regarded specific schools and programmes
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Relevant and practical course content
  • +Supportive and friendly community
Cons
  • -Overcrowded classes limit teacher attention.
  • -Lack of academic support outside of the library leaves students on their own.
  • -A perceived lack of evolution and room for progress within the classroom.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Poor teaching quality and ineffective learning outcomes.
  • -Lack of structure and overwhelming course material.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Teacher favoritism and arbitrary grading practices are a significant issue.
  • -Lack of clear and fair assessment criteria is frustrating.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various metrics, this university shows a strong performance in several key areas. Its highest-rated category is **Value**, demonstrating excellent return on investment. **Professors** and **Student Life** also received very high scores, suggesting a positive academic and social environment. **Internationality** and **Location** are rated well, indicating a diverse and accessible campus. However, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, pointing to a potential area for improvement.

Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.

With outstanding scores in facilities, professors, and accommodation, this institution excels in core academic and living provisions. Student life and internationality are also highly rated, indicating a well-rounded experience. The location receives a good, though not perfect, score, representing the only slight area for potential improvement amidst otherwise excellent feedback. Overall, the university offers substantial value.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

This institution garners strong feedback across multiple aspects. Notably, **Location** received the highest rating at approximately 4.83, followed closely by **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both around 4.73. **Value** also scored well at 4.75. The **Accomodation** rating, while still positive at 4.5, represents the comparatively weaker area among the surveyed categories.

This institution garners significant praise in several key areas. Its accommodation and professor quality stand out with perfect scores. Facilities and student life are also rated highly. However, its location receives a more moderate assessment, suggesting it might be an area for potential improvement or consideration by prospective students. The university also demonstrates good internationality and provides solid value for its students.

With a standout score for its location, this institution demonstrates significant strengths there. Conversely, the ratings indicate a notable weakness in professor quality. The university received average scores in facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, suggesting a consistent, middle-ground experience across these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.39 average rating, ~96% of reviews are positive, highlighting inspiring professors, diverse student interactions, and relevant programs. A small percentage (~4%) of negative feedback mentions overcrowded classes and limited student support.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the diverse student composition and valuable learning opportunities, appreciating the combined strengths of the merged universities.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~94%), with students praising academic depth, quality faculty, and valuable practical projects. A small percentage (~6%) express concerns about teaching quality and course content.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has overwhelmingly positive reviews. Students praise its scenic, spacious main campus and renowned Schools of Electronics and Information, and Medicine. There is no negative feedback.

The single review is negative, giving a 2/5 rating. The student expressed dissatisfaction with teachers imposing prestige and discipline, grading arbitrarily based on participation over exam performance, and showing favoritism.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
100%
100%
60%
69%
100%
0%
4★
33%
0%
0%
40%
25%
0%
0%
3★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
100%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Excellent Value for Money MA TESOL

I did a lot of research before landing on ACG as my choice to do an MA TESOL programme. Firstly, I found the course very good value for money, especially as they offer the Trinity Cert embedded in the programme, a certificate which allows you to teach in most parts of the world. Secondly, I really appreciate the hybrid online

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close