Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO vs Universidad de las Américas - UDLA vs Universidad Católica de Cuenca

Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO (5.00)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES: wins 4/6 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 2/6 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/6 categories
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University - Mrs.: wins 0/6 categories
University of Azuay - UDA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Interior Design
Best programme: Journalism
Best programme: BA International Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.80
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Location
4.32
5.00
4.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.27
4.60
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.14
4.40
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
3.25
4.00
Student life
4.36
4.60
Win
4.00
4.50
Not rated
4.25
3.50
Value
4.10
4.60
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.88
4.40
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Exceptional professors and learning environment
  • +Great opportunities and supportive community
  • +Excellent resources and hands-on learning
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and experienced faculty
  • +Extensive program variety and robust infrastructure
  • +Valuable research opportunities and international collaboration
  • +Strong academics, practical education, and qualified professors
  • +Focus on global/regional understanding and interdisciplinary connections
  • +Collaborative learning and modern facilities
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated teaching methods and materials are a significant concern.
  • -Students are frustrated with administrative and management issues.
  • -Lack of modern facilities and resources hinders the learning experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Unresponsive and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff.
Rating summary
What students say

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

With exceptional marks across the board, this institution shines brightest in its prime **Location**, achieving a perfect score. Students also praise its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

Nothing to show

The institution receives particularly strong marks for its **location**, scoring a perfect 5. Student life is also highly regarded at 4.25, closely followed by the quality of professors at 4. Conversely, the university's **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 3, along with its facilities at 3.5. Internationality is moderately rated at 3.25, and the overall value is considered good at 4.

This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, both receiving a solid but comparatively lower rating. Overall, the university offers good **Value** for its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted excellent professors, dynamic classes, and great learning opportunities. The university also received praise for its infrastructure and student well-being support.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.75/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive faculty, and good research. ~25% of feedback mentions a traditional learning approach.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight enriching academic experiences, deep understanding of global issues, and personal growth. They also praise qualified professors and modern facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
67%
100%
50%
0%
50%
50%
4★
42%
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
3★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close