Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad técnica de machala - UTMACH vs Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO vs University of Eastern Africa Baraton

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO (5.00)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad técnica de machala - UTMACH: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES: wins 4/7 categories
Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO: wins 0/7 categories
University of Eastern Africa Baraton: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Advanced Control and Systems Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Interior Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.00
4.80
Win
3.00
3.86
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.32
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.67
4.57
4.50
Not rated
Professors
4.27
5.00
Win
4.60
4.33
4.57
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
4.14
2.00
4.40
3.33
4.57
Win
4.50
Not rated
Student life
4.36
4.00
4.60
Win
3.67
4.29
4.50
Not rated
Value
4.10
4.00
4.60
4.67
4.71
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.88
3.00
4.40
Win
3.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Unique and stimulating environment for talent
  • +High-quality academic knowledge and career enrichment
  • +Opportunities for diverse friendships and perspectives
  • +Exceptional professors and learning environment
  • +Great opportunities and supportive community
  • +Excellent resources and hands-on learning
  • +High academic standards and rigorous curriculum
  • +Supportive and experienced faculty for professional development
  • +Specialized engineering programs with excellent facilities
  • +Strong faith-based values and spiritual focus
  • +Comprehensive skill development beyond academics
  • +Quality education and competent lecturers
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a major concern.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources frustrate students.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hindered learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support was a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

Reviewing the university's performance reveals distinct strengths and weaknesses. The institution excels in its **Professors (5/5)**, indicating exceptional teaching quality. **Facilities and Student Life** also receive strong marks at **4/5**. However, its **Location (0/5)** is a significant detractor. **Internationality (2/5)** and **Accommodation (3/5)** are areas where improvement could be beneficial, though **Value (4/5)** remains a positive aspect.

With exceptional marks across the board, this institution shines brightest in its prime **Location**, achieving a perfect score. Students also praise its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering.

This institution presents a notable profile, with its strongest area being **Value** at 4.67. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Accommodation** represent its weakest points, both scoring a 3. Other aspects like Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range.

The university demonstrates a very strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** with a rating of 4.71. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality** also received exceptionally high marks, all scoring 4.57. Student life is rated well at 4.29, and accommodation is also solid at 4.0. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **Facilities**, rated at 3.86.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

With one positive review and none negative, feedback suggests a genuinely unique experience and enriching friendships (~50%). The average rating is 3.5/5, with ~0% negative feedback.

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted excellent professors, dynamic classes, and great learning opportunities. The university also received praise for its infrastructure and student well-being support.

All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the academic excellence, skilled teachers, and specialized engineering programs. There is no negative feedback.

University of Eastern Africa, Baraton receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praise its Christian foundation, specialized programs like Automotive Technology and Health Sciences, and the quality of lecturers and education.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
67%
100%
71%
50%
0%
4★
42%
50%
33%
0%
14%
50%
0%
3★
8%
50%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close