Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad Yachay Tech vs Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES vs The National University of Ostroh Academy - NaUOA vs Universidad de las Américas - UDLA

Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ISG Luxury Management (5.00)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Yachay Tech: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES: wins 0/6 categories
The National University of Ostroh Academy - NaUOA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/6 categories
ISG Luxury Management: wins 5/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Biomedical Engineering
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Cybernetics
Best programme: Interior Design
Best programme: Bachelor of Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.00
4.80
4.17
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.32
3.33
5.00
3.17
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.27
3.67
4.60
4.83
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.14
4.33
4.40
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.36
4.00
4.60
4.67
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.10
4.00
4.60
4.83
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.88
3.00
4.40
3.83
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Highly experienced, published faculty
  • +English-language instruction for language skill improvement
  • +Exceptional professors and learning environment
  • +Great opportunities and supportive community
  • +Excellent resources and hands-on learning
  • +Motivated student community and supportive professors
  • +Comprehensive and intensive language programs
  • +Conducive learning environment and practical knowledge application
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Real-world professional training and projects
  • +Experiencing future job roles through practical exercises
  • +Learning valuable marketing and business strategies
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world application.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum limit academic growth.
Rating summary
What students say

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

This institution receives its highest marks in Internationality, Student Life, Facilities, and Value, all scoring a strong 4 or above. However, Accommodation presents a weaker area with a rating of 3. The university also performs moderately well in Professor quality and Location. Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths in several key aspects of the student experience.

With exceptional marks across the board, this institution shines brightest in its prime **Location**, achieving a perfect score. Students also praise its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering.

This institution garners excellent reviews for its faculty and value, both scoring an impressive 4.83. Student life also receives high marks at 4.67. Areas for potential improvement include location, with a rating of 3.17, and accommodation at 3.83. Facilities and internationality are rated moderately well.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

Nothing to show

Across several key areas, this institution receives outstanding feedback. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated a perfect 5. Its weakest area is internationality, receiving a score of 3, suggesting room for growth in global engagement. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths in campus resources and student experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

The limited feedback indicates a generally positive sentiment, with ~33% of reviews being positive. Recurring themes highlight good learning opportunities and English-language classes, though some areas for improvement exist. No negative reviews were recorded.

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted excellent professors, dynamic classes, and great learning opportunities. The university also received praise for its infrastructure and student well-being support.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, ~100% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight supportive professors, motivated students, and a great learning environment. Some mention limited local activities and accommodation.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single positive review highlights practical, career-oriented projects and real-world problem-solving.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
33%
67%
67%
50%
0%
100%
4★
42%
0%
33%
33%
50%
0%
0%
3★
8%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close