Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad Cristiana de las Asambleas de Dios - UCAD vs Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES vs Universidad de las Américas - UDLA vs Universidad Católica de Cuenca

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES (4.70)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Cristiana de las Asambleas de Dios - UCAD: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES: wins 5/6 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/6 categories
Cestar College of Business, Health & Technology: wins 0/6 categories
University of Azuay - UDA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Interior Design
Best programme: BA International Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
Not rated
4.80
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.33
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.27
Not rated
4.60
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.14
Not rated
4.40
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.36
Not rated
4.60
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Value
4.09
Not rated
4.60
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.90
Not rated
4.40
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Positive and supportive study environment
  • +Helpful and cooperative students and teachers
  • +Exceptional professors and learning environment
  • +Great opportunities and supportive community
  • +Excellent resources and hands-on learning
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academics, practical education, and qualified professors
  • +Focus on global/regional understanding and interdisciplinary connections
  • +Collaborative learning and modern facilities
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations from administration.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of support and feeling overwhelmed by workload.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Unresponsive and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff.
Rating summary
What students say

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

This institution presents a uniform rating of zero across all surveyed categories. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses to highlight. The university's performance is consistently low in areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This suggests a critical need for comprehensive review and improvement across every facet of the university experience.

With exceptional marks across the board, this institution shines brightest in its prime **Location**, achieving a perfect score. Students also praise its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, both receiving a solid but comparatively lower rating. Overall, the university offers good **Value** for its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The feedback highlights a positive study environment and helpful interactions between students and teachers.

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted excellent professors, dynamic classes, and great learning opportunities. The university also received praise for its infrastructure and student well-being support.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight enriching academic experiences, deep understanding of global issues, and personal growth. They also praise qualified professors and modern facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
67%
50%
0%
0%
50%
4★
42%
100%
33%
50%
0%
0%
50%
3★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Biothecnology Engineering

The courses content was very extensive and you can learn from different biotechonlogy areas. Therefore, I liked it a lot because when I start university I wasnt sure about what to do or focus yet. However, I believe that in these fields the practice experience is completely necessary. Sadly, there were not too much research opportunities outside from plant biotechnology. That's why I didn't give it full score.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close