Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales - FLACSO Ecuador vs Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar - UASB vs Escuela Politécnica Nacional - EPN vs Universidad Central del Ecuador - UCE

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales - FLACSO Ecuador: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar - UASB: wins 1/1 categories
Escuela Politécnica Nacional - EPN: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Central del Ecuador - UCE: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Construction Engineering Technician
Best programme: English Language Teaching
Best programme: Interior Design
Best programme: BSc Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.32
5.00
Not rated
2.50
4.00
5.00
Location
Not rated
4.32
5.00
Not rated
4.50
4.50
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.27
5.00
Not rated
3.00
4.50
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.14
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.50
4.00
Student life
Not rated
4.36
5.00
Not rated
3.50
4.50
5.00
Value
Not rated
4.10
5.00
Not rated
4.50
4.00
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.88
5.00
Not rated
2.00
4.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality social sciences programs
  • +Strong international connections
  • +Pleasant living environment
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Supportive colleagues and good teachers
  • +Relevant and practical career curriculum
  • +Positive overall experience and good location
  • +Academic excellence & scientific/humanistic standards
  • +Social support & cultural activities
  • +Central location & diverse career options
  • +Accessible location and affordable tuition
  • +Experienced faculty and valuable learning environment
  • +High-quality professional outcomes
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities
  • +Excellent teachers and professional preparation
  • +Strong academic and practical skill development
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Inconsistent and unsupportive administrative processes frustrate students.
  • -A lack of responsiveness and communication from faculty and staff is problematic.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources were disappointing.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality did not meet expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary complications.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Across all surveyed categories, the university received a rating of 0. This indicates no specific areas stood out as particularly strong or weak, suggesting a uniform perception across all aspects evaluated. The absence of distinct positive or negative feedback across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value presents a neutral but undifferentiated profile.

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

This institution achieves a perfect score across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as outstanding. Given the uniform excellence, there are no distinct weakest or strongest areas; the university demonstrates consistently exceptional performance in every evaluated aspect.

This institution presents a uniform, undeveloped profile across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths. Conversely, every category equally represents the institution's weakest areas, indicating a comprehensive lack of development or positive perception in these fundamental university components.

This institution excels in its **location** and **value**, both receiving high marks. Conversely, **accommodations** and **facilities** present the weakest areas, scoring significantly lower. Professor quality and student life are rated moderately well, as is its international presence.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

This institution scores exceptionally well across most assessed aspects. Its strengths are evident in facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect score of 5. While still strong, internationality is the area with the lowest rating at 4. Overall, the university offers excellent value.

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being positive. Students praise its high academic level and international connections.

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This overwhelmingly positive feedback highlights good teachers, location, and curriculum, with supportive colleagues noted.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the university's strong academic programs, social opportunities, and contribution to national development.

With an average rating of 4/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive. Students praise the university's accessibility and affordability. Limited negative feedback exists.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise exceptional teaching quality, noting excellent preparation for academic and professional challenges. No negative reviews were provided.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
100%
33%
33%
50%
100%
4★
100%
42%
0%
67%
33%
50%
0%
3★
0%
8%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close