Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE vs Universidad Libre - UniLibre

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ (4.80)
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 2/5 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Libre - UniLibre: wins 3/5 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Management
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.74
5.00
4.33
4.33
5.00
2.33
Not rated
Location
4.56
4.50
4.33
4.33
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.68
Win
4.50
4.00
4.67
4.50
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
4.42
Win
2.00
3.00
3.00
3.50
2.33
Not rated
Student life
4.63
4.50
3.67
4.33
5.00
Win
2.67
Not rated
Value
4.47
5.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
2.67
Not rated
Accommodation
4.37
4.00
4.00
3.67
5.00
Win
2.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Supportive environment & student well-being
  • +Academic focus & professional growth
  • +Welcoming campus & convenient location
  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience
  • +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
  • +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
  • +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.
  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
85%
67%
20%
33%
33%
33%
0%
4★
7%
33%
40%
67%
67%
0%
0%
3★
7%
0%
40%
0%
0%
67%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close