Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 2/6 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 1/6 categories
Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina: wins 2/6 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 1/6 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Science (Recreation and Sports Management)
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.74
5.00
4.67
5.00
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.56
4.50
4.67
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.68
Win
4.50
4.67
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.42
2.00
3.67
5.00
Win
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.63
4.50
4.67
Win
4.00
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.47
5.00
Win
4.33
2.00
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.37
Win
4.00
3.67
4.00
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Quality programs and affordable tuition
  • +Practical experience and real-world application
  • +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements
  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities
  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
85%
67%
100%
100%
33%
0%
0%
4★
7%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close