Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Centro Colombo Americano

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES (5.00)
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB: wins 1/7 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 3/7 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/7 categories
Centro Colombo Americano: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.74
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.56
4.60
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.68
4.20
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.42
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.63
Win
3.80
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.47
4.40
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.37
Win
2.20
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
  • +Elite academic programs and strong teachers
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
  • +Humanistic focus and values
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

An overall assessment of the university reveals a strong performance in several key areas. The location stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.6, closely followed by professors at 4.2 and value at 4.4. Facilities and internationality also received a solid 4. Student life is rated moderately at 3.8. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a considerably lower score of 2.2.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive, students highly praise the university's strong tradition, excellent teachers, and quality facilities. Key themes include a humanist approach, elite orientation in economics, and good learning methodologies, with ~92% of feedback being highly positive.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
85%
54%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
7%
38%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
7%
8%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close