Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA

Side-by-side comparison from 47 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES (5.00)
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 5/7 categories
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 1/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.74
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.33
Not rated
Location
4.56
4.60
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.33
Not rated
Professors
4.68
Win
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Not rated
Internationality
4.42
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.63
Win
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Value
4.47
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.37
Win
2.20
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
  • +Elite academic programs and strong teachers
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
  • +Humanistic focus and values

Nothing to show

  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Strong academic programs with qualified instructors and research opportunities.
  • +Practical learning experiences and updated course content.
  • +Accessible location and vibrant campus life.
  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

An overall assessment of the university reveals a strong performance in several key areas. The location stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.6, closely followed by professors at 4.2 and value at 4.4. Facilities and internationality also received a solid 4. Student life is rated moderately at 3.8. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a considerably lower score of 2.2.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **location** with a rating of 4.5. **Professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also received favorable scores of 4. The university's **internationality** is its weakest area, rated at 3. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.5, while the overall **value** is considered good at 4.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive, students highly praise the university's strong tradition, excellent teachers, and quality facilities. Key themes include a humanist approach, elite orientation in economics, and good learning methodologies, with ~92% of feedback being highly positive.

Nothing to show

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight qualified instructors, strong research promotion, and efforts to improve practical education. No negative feedback was received.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
85%
54%
0%
100%
33%
33%
0%
4★
7%
38%
0%
0%
67%
67%
0%
3★
7%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close