Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO

Side-by-side comparison from 68 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO: wins 0/6 categories
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 1/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: BA (hons) Psychology
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.74
Win
3.98
4.60
4.33
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.56
3.95
4.00
4.33
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.68
4.52
4.67
4.40
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.42
4.29
4.67
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.63
Win
4.44
4.20
4.50
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.47
Win
4.33
4.17
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
4.37
3.80
4.00
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
  • +Innovative programs with practical application and real-world projects
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors dedicated to student growth
  • +Comprehensive and ethical education fostering personal and professional development
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Supportive and caring staff offering detailed explanations.
  • +Emphasis on self-reliance and critical thinking in learning.
  • +Flexible online learning options with advanced technological resources.
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
  • -Inefficient administrative and communication issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum development is a significant concern.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

An overview of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Internationality and value are also rated very favorably. Facilities, location, and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weaker aspects of the university's offerings, scoring lower than other categories.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

This institution receives consistently high marks, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.5. **Value** and **Internationality** are the lowest-rated areas, though still solid at 4.0. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Location also demonstrate strong performance, with ratings around 4.3 to 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

With ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4.54/5 stars, reviews highlight an innovative and comprehensive education. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, practical projects, and opportunities for growth and international experiences.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

Students report a highly positive experience (~100% of feedback), praising strong organizational support, attentive staff, and engaging learning methods. Some minor navigation and response time issues were noted.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
85%
58%
86%
80%
100%
0%
100%
4★
7%
38%
14%
20%
0%
0%
0%
3★
7%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close