Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA vs Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO (5.00)
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 1/7 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/7 categories
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA: wins 2/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 2/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.74
4.20
4.20
4.86
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.56
4.80
Win
3.80
4.43
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.68
4.60
4.17
4.57
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.42
4.40
3.00
3.29
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.63
Win
4.40
4.20
4.29
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.47
4.60
4.50
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.37
Win
4.25
3.00
4.17
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Innovative and practical programs with real-world application
  • +Supportive and experienced instructors
  • +Valuable facilities and career opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often deemed inadequate.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

With a robust showing in several key areas, this university excels in its **Facilities**, earning a near-perfect score. **Value** and **Professors** also received commendably high marks. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. While **Student Life** and **Accomodation** received solid scores, they represent areas with room for growth when compared to the university's strongest attributes.

Nothing to show

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

Reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students praise excellent facilities, well-maintained equipment, and innovative programs. Technical and soft skills development, along with valuable professor support, are frequently mentioned.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
85%
40%
43%
43%
0%
100%
0%
4★
7%
40%
29%
57%
0%
0%
0%
3★
7%
20%
29%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close