American University of Beirut vs Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth - USJ vs Lebanese American University - LAU vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Notre Dame University Louaize - NDU

Side-by-side comparison from 55 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Haigazian University (5.00)
American University of Beirut: wins 0/7 categories
Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth - USJ: wins 0/7 categories
Lebanese American University - LAU: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
Notre Dame University Louaize - NDU: wins 3/7 categories
Haigazian University: wins 2/7 categories
Modern University for Business and Science: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Food Nutrition and Dietetics
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Beirut, Lebanon
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.30
3.33
4.30
4.50
4.75
Win
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.56
4.00
4.33
4.75
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.24
3.67
4.17
4.63
Win
4.50
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.13
3.33
3.50
4.63
Win
4.25
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.40
3.00
4.58
3.88
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.07
3.33
3.83
4.13
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.86
3.67
3.92
3.00
4.75
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality faculty and rigorous academic programs
  • +Supportive student services and strong community atmosphere
  • +Vibrant campus life and diverse extracurricular activities
  • +High-quality education and excellent teachers
  • +Well-equipped facilities and organized programs
  • +Strong reputation and career prospects
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Diverse student community and collaborative environment
  • +Strong academic foundation and practical learning opportunities
  • +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
  • +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
  • +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
  • +Excellent academic programs and faculty support
  • +Supportive and accessible campus environment
  • +Career preparation and guidance
  • +academic excellence & dedicated faculty
  • +vibrant learning environment & community engagement
  • +promotion of cultural awareness & critical thinking

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsive faculty create a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including perceived dishonesty and unhelpfulness.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently mentioned.
  • -Lack of resources and support are significant concerns.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of maintenance.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum.
  • -Poor administrative support and communication.
  • -Overcrowded classes and limited resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible academic policies and unresponsive administrative staff cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern technology detract from the educational experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university performs exceptionally well in its location, earning a high rating of 4.56. Student life and professors also receive strong scores, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.86, while other aspects like facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid range.

The university presents a mixed profile, with its strongest rating in **Location** at 4. Areas of good performance include **Professors** and **Accomodation**, both scoring 3.67. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating at 3.0. Facilities, Internationality, and Value all fall in the mid-range with scores around 3.33.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, receiving a high rating of 4.58. Location and facilities also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, internationality and accommodation appear to be areas for potential improvement, with scores of 3.5 and 3.92 respectively. The university's value for money and professor quality are rated moderately.

Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded profile, with student life receiving the highest possible score of 5.0. Facilities and accommodation also stand out with excellent ratings of 4.75. Conversely, internationality is the weakest area, scoring 4.25, though still a strong performance. Professors, location, and value all achieve a solid 4.5.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect rating for its **location** and strong marks for **value** and **professors**. While student life and facilities are also well-regarded, the **accommodation** rating stands as the weakest aspect, suggesting potential for improvement in that specific domain. Overall, the university presents a compelling proposition, particularly for those prioritizing accessibility and affordability.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~85% of feedback being positive, students praise the high-quality education and supportive professors. They also appreciate the engaging campus life and comprehensive curriculum. There is virtually no negative feedback.

University reviews are mostly positive, with 2 out of 3 (about 67%) giving high ratings. Students praised the high level of education and well-equipped facilities. One review (about 33%) expressed dissatisfaction, citing concerns about the university's focus on money over students and inconsistent support.

Approximately 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging courses, supportive faculty, and academic excellence. Some mention slow bureaucracy and chaotic registration as minor issues.

All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise academic excellence, helpful faculty, and a supportive learning environment. There are no reported negative reviews.

With one review, the average rating is a perfect 5/5. This sole feedback is highly favorable, appreciating academic excellence, diversity, and a vibrant learning environment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
48%
33%
33%
63%
50%
100%
0%
4★
37%
33%
50%
38%
50%
0%
0%
3★
15%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Medical Laboratory School is recommended

I spent 3 years at USJ in the faculty of pharmacy, school of medical analysis laboratory technicians (ETLAM). The school was well organized, the lessons very clear with excellent teachers and access to the university's laboratories, which were also well equipped. I recommend those who wish to work as clinical laboratory technicians to continue their studies at USJ. The lessons are given in French, but we also had English lessons to improve our skills in this language. Student life at USJ is friendly, that said, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that the timetable is decided beforehand, the student cannot choose his own schedule as in other universities in Lebanon.

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close