Universidad Simón Bolívar vs Universidad Nacional Abierta - UNA vs Universidad Experimental de Las Artes - UNEARTE vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO vs Universidad Católica Santa Rosa - Ucsar

Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO (5.00)
Universidad Simón Bolívar: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Abierta - UNA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Experimental de Las Artes - UNEARTE: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Católica Santa Rosa - Ucsar: wins 2/6 categories
Instituto Universitario Tecnológico Américo Vespucio - IUTAV: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Experimental de las Telecomunicaciones e Informática - UNETI: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Arts
Best programme: Advanced Control and Systems Engineering
Best programme: Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
3.57
3.98
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.29
4.00
4.00
3.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
3.23
4.00
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.86
3.50
4.00
Win
3.33
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
3.67
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.84
3.73
5.00
4.67
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.98
3.50
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive environment fostering professional and personal growth
  • +Accessible academic opportunities and financial aid
  • +High-quality programs with committed faculty and diverse offerings
  • +Flexible and distance learning
  • +Accessible and inclusive admission
  • +Strong academic support and quality education
  • +Focus on artistic preparation and free experimentation
  • +Emphasis on community and social artistic experience
  • +Offers diverse degree options for artistic readiness
  • +High academic standards and rigorous curriculum
  • +Supportive and experienced faculty for professional development
  • +Specialized engineering programs with excellent facilities
  • +Affordable tuition fees
  • +Relevant and updated curricula

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent problem.
  • -Facilities and resources are frequently described as outdated or inadequate.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods often feel disconnected from real-world application.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated curriculum are a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources frustrate students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a major problem.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional praise for its professors, receiving a perfect score. Student life and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4 and 3.86 respectively. However, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring just under 3. Facilities and location also received moderate ratings. The overall value of the university is highly regarded, indicated by a near-perfect score.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in **Location** and **Student Life**, both earning perfect scores. **Facilities** also rank highly, indicating a well-equipped campus. Conversely, **Professors** received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range.

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. It also performs well in **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, each rated at 4. **Location** and **Professors** are also strong points, each earning a 4. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with standout strengths in its physical environment and student experience.

This institution presents a notable profile, with its strongest area being **Value** at 4.67. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Accommodation** represent its weakest points, both scoring a 3. Other aspects like Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **accommodation**, both receiving perfect scores. **Value for money** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **facilities** and **student life** are identified as areas for potential improvement, each scoring a moderate three out of five. **Professors** and **internationality** fall in the middle range, indicating a solid but not exceptional performance in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.78/5 from 18 reviews, all feedback is positive. Students highlight a welcoming atmosphere, professional development support, and high-quality teaching, particularly in engineering and sciences.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.2/5. Students praise flexibility, time management, and the ability to study and work concurrently, citing the distance learning model and accessible educational materials.

The single review highlights strong preparation in all art areas and community participation. Free experimentation and practice in workshops are noted positively. The university fosters readiness to become an artist.

All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the academic excellence, skilled teachers, and specialized engineering programs. There is no negative feedback.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4/5. Positive comments highlight satisfactory distance learning options and reasonable tuition fees.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
78%
20%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
22%
80%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The best study house

I studied at Simón Bolívar University from 2005, until 2011; obtaining the title of Chemical Engineer. For me, it is one of the best study houses. I met the best teachers, they have a well-known library, many areas of study, which are important for the development of the student career. My work achievements I owe to that university.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close