Universidad Metropolitana - UNIMET vs Universidad Católica Andrés Bello - UCAB vs Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela - UBV vs Universidad Nacional Abierta - UNA vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO

Side-by-side comparison from 111 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Metropolitana - UNIMET: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Católica Andrés Bello - UCAB: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela - UBV: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Abierta - UNA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nueva Esparta - UNE: wins 0/6 categories
Instituto Universitario De Diseño Las Mercedes - IUDLM: wins 5/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: Audiovisual Communication
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Advanced Control and Systems Engineering
Best programme: Interior Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.17
4.09
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.50
3.17
4.00
4.00
3.67
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.17
4.25
4.00
3.25
4.33
2.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.17
3.58
4.00
Win
3.50
3.33
1.00
3.00
Student life
4.33
4.58
4.00
4.00
3.67
1.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.00
4.42
4.00
3.75
4.67
1.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.67
3.73
4.00
3.50
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent educators and integral student development
  • +Supportive learning environment and career preparation
  • +Good facilities and positive campus atmosphere
  • +High-quality education and dedicated teachers
  • +Comprehensive personal and professional development
  • +Excellent facilities and good value
  • +Highly qualified teachers and pleasant student environment
  • +Good facilities and safety
  • +Easy access to university
  • +Flexible and distance learning
  • +Accessible and inclusive admission
  • +Strong academic support and quality education
  • +High academic standards and rigorous curriculum
  • +Supportive and experienced faculty for professional development
  • +Specialized engineering programs with excellent facilities
  • +Relevant, advanced career programs
  • +Professional development and expertise
  • +Conducive study environment
  • +Engaging and challenging academic programs
  • +Creative and collaborative learning environment
  • +Focus on ecological and sustainable design
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods are a recurring problem.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of faculty availability hinder student support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated curriculum are a problem.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources frustrate students.
  • -Insufficient qualified teaching staff leads to underqualified instructors.
  • -Curriculum reduction omits essential subjects.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching or relevant curriculum is a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This university presents a mixed but generally positive performance. It excels in its **Location**, earning a high score of 4.5. **Student Life** and **Facilities**/ **Professors** also receive strong marks. However, **Accomodation** and particularly **Internationality** are areas with room for improvement, showing the lowest ratings. **Value** stands at a respectable 4.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its vibrant Student Life, earning a near-perfect score. Value for money is also a significant positive, alongside highly-rated Professors. Conversely, the university's Location received the lowest marks, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like Facilities, Accommodation, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range.

Demonstrating a consistently high performance, this institution received uniform scores of 4 out of 5 across all evaluated aspects. No specific category emerged as a standout strength or weakness, with facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all achieving equal recognition. This suggests a well-rounded and uniformly positive university experience.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in **Location** and **Student Life**, both earning perfect scores. **Facilities** also rank highly, indicating a well-equipped campus. Conversely, **Professors** received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range.

This institution presents a notable profile, with its strongest area being **Value** at 4.67. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Accommodation** represent its weakest points, both scoring a 3. Other aspects like Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range.

This institution shines in its **location**, receiving a perfect score, and demonstrates solid performance in **facilities**. However, significant weaknesses are apparent in **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all earning a low rating of 1. **Professors** and **accommodation** fall in the middle range, suggesting areas for development alongside the lower-scoring aspects.

The university receives outstanding scores in several key areas, achieving a perfect 5 out of 5 for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value. Its weakest area, Internationality, scored a 3 out of 5, indicating room for improvement in global engagement and diversity. Overall, the institution offers a highly rated experience across most aspects of university life.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.61/5 from 18 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent educators, integral student development, and a strong focus on preparing competitive employees and entrepreneurs. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.76, ~99% of reviews are positive. Students highlight significant learning experiences, high-quality teaching staff, and comprehensive preparation. Some mention infrastructure and access challenges.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent teachers and facilities, alongside a pleasant and safe environment. There is minimal negative feedback regarding administrative processes.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.2/5. Students praise flexibility, time management, and the ability to study and work concurrently, citing the distance learning model and accessible educational materials.

All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the academic excellence, skilled teachers, and specialized engineering programs. There is no negative feedback.

The university receives generally positive feedback, with ~75% of reviews being highly favorable. Some minor concerns were noted about limited transportation access and teaching staff qualifications.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight enriching experiences, engaging professors, and a fostering of creativity and collaboration, particularly within the Interior Design program with its ecological design emphasis.

Rating distribution
5★
72%
78%
0%
20%
100%
50%
100%
4★
17%
19%
100%
80%
0%
25%
0%
3★
11%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A good university in general

It is one of the best colleges in Venezuela. The school never stops teaching and you are given all the tools to be a competitive employee or entrepreneur in the future. Recommended if you wish to study engineering.

Ucab the best university in Venezuela

The catholic university andres bello is one of the best in Venezuela, being ranked 65 of the best in the world, all this is due to the academic excellence that has maintained despite the crisis we are experiencing in recent years, the professionals who have graduated in this house of study are recognized nationally and internationally. Being a student of ing is a great pride because they teach you an important tool at this moment, which is the ability not to be a professional over the crowd, but to excel among others and achieve all our goals and be successful

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Not the best moment for this university

At this moment, this is not the best university to study on Venezuela, it doesn't have enough teachers for all the subjects, because of that, there are students teaching, they are not even graduated. Also they reduced the career from 5 to 4 years, that wasn't good because now we don't see some important subjects that help on the field of engineering. I don't recommend it at this moment.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close