University of Zenica - UNZE vs International Business Information Academy - IPIA vs The University of Auckland vs King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals vs IILM University
Side-by-side comparison from 373 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Calm, focused learning environment
- +Practical, industry-experienced faculty
- +Organized, medium-sized campus
- +Quality education with supportive staff and professors
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities and classrooms
- +Passionate and world-caliber faculty
- +Excellent academic and career support
- +High-quality learning environments and resources
- +Excellent engineering programs and facilities
- +Supportive administration and alumni network
- +Good professors and grading practices
- +Relevant, industry-oriented, and practical curricula
- +Supportive faculty and interactive learning environment
- +Vibrant campus life with frequent, engaging events
- +ISO certification and core values embodiment.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not well-taught.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant, lacking practical application and depth.
- -Ineffective and repetitive course content with poorly designed assessments.
- -Poor quality of teaching and insufficient, unhelpful feedback.
- -Lack of student support and focus on finances over well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and opportunities after graduation are a concern.
Nothing to show
This institution presents a compelling profile, excelling in key areas such as professors, location, student life, internationality, and value, all receiving perfect scores. Its facilities, while still strong, are rated the lowest at a respectable 3. Accommodation also scores highly at a 4. Overall, the university offers a well-rounded and highly desirable experience.
This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Its strongest areas are clearly these aspects, reflecting a highly positive student experience and excellent offerings. The Facilities rating, while still very good at 4, represents the only slight area for potential improvement within an otherwise exceptional overall assessment.
Professors and location are standout areas for this university, both receiving scores above 4.0. Student life and accommodation, however, represent the weakest points, with ratings slightly below 3.7. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across its facilities, internationality, and value, with scores clustering around 3.8-3.9.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its accommodations and international student experience, both receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and professors are also well-regarded, scoring 4. Student life and value are solid at 3 and 4 respectively. The primary area for improvement lies in its location, which received the lowest score of 2.5.
Overall, this institution garners positive feedback, with its strongest performance in **Professors** (4.57), closely followed by **Value** (4.51) and **Accomodation** (4.48). **Facilities** (4.40) and **Student Life** (4.40) also receive high marks. The area receiving the lowest rating is **Internationality** (4.17), though it remains a respectable score.
Consistently high marks are awarded across every evaluated aspect, indicating a well-rounded and excellent institution. Notably, the university excels in its facilities, professor quality, prime location, vibrant student life, accommodating lodgings, and international appeal, all receiving perfect scores. There are no discernible weak areas; every category achieved the maximum rating, reflecting a top-tier experience.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the university is perceived positively. It offers a calm and focused learning environment, particularly for engineering and technical fields, with a practical, industry-focused approach.
The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the quality education, supportive professors, and modern, well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate and supportive faculty, high-quality education, and excellent facilities. A small amount of negative feedback (~6.4%) mentions repetitive course content and limited instructor feedback.
With one positive review, students highlight good engineering programs, labs, and infrastructure. The average rating is 3.5/5 stars, with ~50% positive sentiment. Campus life was noted as a bit boring.
With ~99% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.69/5, students praise relevant, industry-oriented curricula and strong faculty support. They highlight a vibrant campus life with numerous events and holistic development opportunities. Minimal negative feedback was reported.
The sole review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a perfect 5/5 rating. This single review highlights the university's strong adherence to core values and its ISO certification.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I found that the overall university experience was not really worth my time and money. Respected professors were only actually lecturing for 1-2 weeks per course, with PhD graduates teaching the majority of the course. Sometimes these PhD graduates weren't able to speak fluent English, which made the learning and teaching actually going on very questionable. In addition to this, you would submit a 3000 word essay, and receive a 15-20 words of feedback. I am certain that very little learning, improvement and education can occur when the feedback loop is so minimal, often generic. In addition to this, many of the "lab" or "tutorial" components were actually university students completing post-graduate experiments as part of their thesis studies. For example, in my psych201 tutorial, we had to spend 2 hours looking at a screen only pressing the "X" or "Z" key a total of 1200 times, and if we did not attend this lecture, we would lose 2% of our total grade. Overall, I question how much education and learning goes on, specifically in the Commerce and Science Faculties. I found my high school classes to go into more depth, with the teachers actually providing many one-on-one conversations to ensure learning is taking place, and this is the learnings that allowed me to pass my first 3 years of papers before any new content was covered, after which, the lectures would have half the class walk out because they couldn't speak fluent english, with students opting to self-teach themselves. If you are requiring students to partake in a study, they must be reimbursed for their time, especially if no learning is taking place. If you are charging students $1000 per course, then the university can afford to pay for staff to assess all of the PHD candidates fluency in English, before they are allowed to teach. In addition, no learning can take place when a question is asked in a foreign language, and the tutor/lecturer replies in a foreign language.
Nothing to show
As a second-year student at IILM University in Greater Noida, here's my experience so far: Positive Aspects: 1. **Infrastructure**: The university offers modern facilities, including well-equipped classrooms, a spacious library, and other amenities that create a good learning environment. 2. **Faculty**: The professors are knowledgeable and bring a lot of industry experience to the table. Many of them are approachable and willing to support us in both academics and personal growth. 3. **Industry Exposure**: I’ve had the opportunity to participate in various workshops, guest lectures, and internships, which have helped me gain practical insights into my field of study. 4. **Campus Life**: The campus is vibrant, with a variety of extracurricular activities like sports, cultural events, and student clubs. It’s been a great way to balance academics with personal interests. 5. **Location**: Being located in Greater Noida, it’s easy to travel to and from Delhi. The area is also growing in terms of educational and industrial opportunities, which is an added advantage. ### Areas of Concern: 1. **Fee Structure**: The fees are on the higher side compared to some other universities, which can be a bit of a challenge for some students. 2. **Placement**: While the placement cell does its best, I’ve heard mixed reviews regarding the placements for some specialized programs. Management courses tend to have better placement outcomes, but it's something I’m still keeping an eye on. 3. **Facilities**: Though the infrastructure is good, I think there’s room for improvement in areas like hostel maintenance. Sometimes, the upkeep of certain facilities could be better. 4. **Reputation**: While the university’s reputation is improving, it doesn’t yet have the same level of recognition as some of the more established universities, which is something to consider when thinking about long-term prospects. Overall, my experience at IILM has been positive. The academic and campus life are fulfilling, and I’m gaining valuable exposure to the industry. However, I do hope to see improvements in placements and the fee structure as I move forward in my studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show