University of Bucharest - UB vs Seattle University- Seattle U vs University of Tlemcen vs University of London vs University Centre of Maghnia

Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Tlemcen (5.00)
University of Bucharest - UB: wins 1/7 categories
Seattle University- Seattle U: wins 1/7 categories
University of Tlemcen: wins 2/7 categories
University of London: wins 3/7 categories
University Centre of Maghnia: wins 0/7 categories
Istanbul Ticaret University: wins 0/7 categories
Caraga State University - Carsu: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mathematics
Seattle, Washington, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Financial Management
Tlemcen, Algeria
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
London, The United Kingdom
4.60
Read more reviews
16 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Law LLB
Best programme: Political Economy
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.38
4.00
4.50
Win
4.30
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.61
Win
3.50
3.50
4.36
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.16
4.00
4.00
4.31
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.62
5.00
Win
4.50
4.38
1.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.02
3.50
4.00
4.50
Win
2.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.03
3.50
4.50
4.56
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.30
3.50
4.00
Win
3.75
1.00
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Welcoming environment and vibrant student community.
  • +Valuable academic development and cognitive growth.
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty interaction
  • +Prime urban location and access to opportunities
  • +Dedicated student support
  • +Strong academic foundation and preparation for the workforce
  • +Opportunities for supplementary learning through seminars and webinars
  • +Faculty expertise and development of practical skills
  • +Strong academic resources and LSE curriculum
  • +Effective administration and flexible learning environment
  • +Cooperative professors and engaging teaching methods

Nothing to show

  • +supportive and close-knit student community
  • +limited English-taught courses and Erasmus opportunities for non-English speakers

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of professor engagement and overwhelming schedules.
  • -Inadequate and delayed scholarships.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as not relevant or current.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency causes frustration.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently mentioned.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners its highest marks in **Location** and **Professors**, reflecting strong student satisfaction in these areas. **Student Life** and **Value** also received positive ratings. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weakest aspects of the student experience, receiving comparatively lower scores. **Internationality** falls in the middle range of assessments.

This institution excels in its internationality, receiving a perfect score. Facilities and professors are also strong points, both rated at a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.5.

This university garners excellent marks in several key areas. Its strongest aspects include its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring a high 4.5, alongside strong **Value** at the same rating. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** also receive solid scores of 4. The **Location** is the weakest area, rated at 3.5.

This institution receives very positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both scoring 4.5 or higher. **Location** and **Internationality** also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accommodations** received the lowest rating among the surveyed areas, indicating potential room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors** are consistently strong.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities** and **location**, both receiving a rating of 4. **Student life** also scores well at 4. Conversely, the **accommodation** stands out as a significant weakness, with a low rating of 1. Ratings for **professors**, **internationality**, and **value** are moderate, all sitting at a 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The University of Bucharest is highly rated by ~74% of reviewers. Students praise knowledgeable faculty, enriching experiences, and a vibrant community. A small percentage (~3%) noted administrative issues and scheduling concerns.

With an average rating of 4 out of 5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight strong academics, student support, and the advantageous urban location. No negative feedback was recorded.

Both reviews are highly positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students praise academic successes, knowledgeable faculty, and a curriculum that prepares them for the work field, including useful lab work and skill development.

University of London reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% with 4-5 stars), with an average rating of 4.63. Students praise job-ready skills, cooperative professors, excellent VLE, and comprehensive programs with LSE curriculum. Some noted challenges with online learning and lack of face-to-face interaction.

Nothing to show

This university receives highly positive feedback, with a 4/5 average rating. The small student community and Erasmus opportunities are frequently praised. Turkish is the primary language of instruction, though some English courses are available.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
47%
50%
100%
63%
0%
0%
0%
4★
32%
0%
0%
38%
0%
100%
0%
3★
18%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Good practice, a lot of information but not a lot of job opportunities

It's one of the most active National Universities in our Country located in the center of the Capital City. We had several practices during the Bachelor's and Master's degree. We gathered a lot of useful information and also combined knowledge with practical activities in different locations of the country in the environmental field. We managed to understand the environment and to share our knowledge to people around us but the main problem in our country is that the hiring opportunities in this field are very low. Could be just a national problem and maybe we didn't have the support from the University in order to follow our domain.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Great

In my opinion choosing UOL for my undergrad was the best decision of my life. It not only taught be job ready skills it taught me how to approach a difficult task and win. The VLE portal was just awesome. The VLE or virtual learning environment provided me with necessary course and study material. Which was very helpful for a better understanding of Law.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close