Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires - ITBA vs IES LV "Juan Ramón Fernández" - LV vs National University of Mar del Plata vs Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL
Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
- +High-quality professors with real-world experience
- +Practical, project-based learning and career support
- +Excellent and dedicated teachers preparing for real-world challenges
- +Supportive learning environment and community
- +Strong focus on technology and engineering
Nothing to show
- +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
- +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
- +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers
- +Updated and relevant program content
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Well-resourced library and effective virtual learning environment
Nothing to show
- +Expert professors and supportive environment
- +Comfortable, large, and safe campus
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common grievances.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes criticized.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of communication and transparency frustrates students.
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized administrative processes and poor communication.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating an outstanding educational experience. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. There are no weak areas identified; the university demonstrates exceptional strength in every category evaluated.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.
This institution achieves excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, location, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional quality. Student life and professors are also highly rated. The weakest aspect appears to be internationality, with a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in its physical resources and accessibility, with excellent perceived value.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, earning a perfect score. It also receives consistently positive feedback for its facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value, all rated at 4 out of 5. The weakest areas for the university are its location and internationality, both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent teachers and strong preparation for the workforce. Facilities are acceptable and undergoing remodeling.
Nothing to show
All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.
With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight the updated program content focusing on new technologies and media. They praise excellent professor support and quick assignment feedback, alongside an extensive library.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a comfortable, safe, and supportive environment. Expert professors and beautiful grounds are praised. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Undoubtedly Buenos Aires is a big city with many options in terms of higher education, but the Technological Institute is undoubtedly the best option (in my opinion) to study everything related to technology. I studied computer and data engineering, the experience was great. The teachers are qualified, the facilities are acceptable, and the classmates were very supportive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show