Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina - UCA vs Universidad del Cema - UCEMA vs Universidad del Salvador - USAL

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad del Cema - UCEMA (5.00)
Universidad de Palermo - UP: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE: wins 6/7 categories
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina - UCA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad del Cema - UCEMA: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad del Salvador - USAL: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Belgrano - UB: wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Superior de Formación Docente N°41: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
4.30
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Administration
Buenos Aires, Argentina
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Industrial and Production Engineering
Best programme: Psychology
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Communications
Best programme: Education Studies and English
Category ratings
Facilities
4.40
4.75
Win
4.25
4.50
3.33
4.00
2.00
Location
3.80
4.75
Win
3.67
4.50
3.67
4.50
4.00
Professors
4.20
4.50
Win
4.25
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.80
4.63
4.13
5.00
Win
3.33
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.60
4.63
Win
4.33
4.50
4.00
3.00
4.00
Value
3.80
4.75
Win
4.63
4.50
4.67
3.50
4.00
Accommodation
3.80
4.75
Win
4.50
4.50
2.33
3.50
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
  • +High-quality professors with real-world experience
  • +Practical, project-based learning and career support
  • +Excellent support and resources
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities
  • +Practical experience and industry connections
  • +Practical, real-world application of learning
  • +Supportive staff and comfortable facilities
  • +High-quality education and valuable peer connections
  • +World-class faculty with practical, real-world experience
  • +High-quality education encouraging critical thinking and idea generation
  • +Excellent value for money
  • +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
  • +Positive and well-structured learning environment
  • +Academic validity and expert tutors
  • +Modern and accessible facilities
  • +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
  • +Dedicated and supportive teachers
  • +Balanced theory and practice in challenging classes
  • +Warm and respectful environment
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
  • -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.

Impressively high marks distinguish this university across most aspects of student experience. Facilities, location, accommodation, and value are particularly strong, all receiving a near-perfect 4.75. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.625. Professors are rated highly at 4.5, representing the most moderate score within this excellent overall assessment.

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in accommodation, receiving a high rating of 4.5, and particularly excels in value for money, scoring an impressive 4.625. Student life also garners exceptional feedback at 4.33. Conversely, the location presents the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this area compared to its other well-regarded features.

With an outstanding perfect score in Internationality, this institution truly shines in its global engagement. High ratings also highlight its excellent Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value, all scoring a strong 4.5. The only area receiving a slightly lower, though still positive, score is its Professors, at 4.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.

The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, **location**, and **student life**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **facilities** and **accommodation** stand out as areas requiring significant improvement, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is moderately rated at 3, and the overall **value** is considered strong at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~91% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent education, supportive staff, modern campus facilities, and career opportunities. No negative feedback was received.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students value the concrete teaching approach combining theory and practical application, excellent curricular level, and supportive staff and peers.

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight world-class faculty with practical experience, accessibility of virtual classes, and excellent value for money.

Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.

Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight well-prepared, dedicated teachers and a warm, respectful environment. Some mention the building needs improvement.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
45%
36%
100%
67%
0%
0%
4★
23%
27%
64%
0%
33%
50%
100%
3★
23%
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close