Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Escuela de Administración de Negocios - EAN vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL vs Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC
Side-by-side comparison from 47 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
- +Positive and supportive campus environment.
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurship integrated across programs.
- +Diverse language options and specialized career paths within Modern Languages.
- +High-quality teaching, student well-being, and administrative improvements.
- +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
- +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
- +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
- +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
- +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
- +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies
- +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
- +Diverse and in-demand programs
- +Convenient campus access
- +Professional development & industry relevance
- +Life projects & research opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are also significant drawbacks.
- -Inflexible curriculum and teaching methods are a recurring point of dissatisfaction.
- -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
- -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
- -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and equipment are consistently outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Instructors' teaching quality and availability are often insufficient.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.
This institution garners excellent marks, with professors and location standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a perfect score. Student life and value also score highly, indicating a positive overall experience. Facilities and accommodation are rated well, while internationality is a solid but comparatively lower-scoring aspect.
This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.
This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.
This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniform ratings. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent scoring suggests an even distribution of perceived quality across these key aspects of the university experience.
Nothing to show
With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight the university's focus on sustainable entrepreneurship, diverse language options within programs like Modern Languages, and quality teaching.
With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.
With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.
With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.
With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's professional development and real-world opportunities. One reviewer suggested incorporating more training on modern technologies like Azure and Big Data.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Ean University is one of the most socially diverse institutions you can find in Bogotá. Its guiding principle is "Sustainable Entrepreneurship"—a philosophy deeply embedded in the curriculum. Regardless of their major, every student is required to engage with this concept at some point in their academic journey. I am currently enrolled in the Modern Languages program, which offers a strong foundation in Spanish and English, along with the option to study additional foreign languages such as German, French, Italian, or Portuguese. The program also allows students to choose from three different areas of emphasis: translation skills, digital communication, or organizational communication. I genuinely enjoy studying at Ean University. It equips students with essential tools for entering the labor market. Even as a student in the Faculty of Humanities, I am required to learn about business and economic strategies—something I find particularly valuable for those who aspire to go beyond language learning and theoretical knowledge. Another aspect I appreciate is how the university supports students in developing their start-up ideas, regardless of whether those ventures are currently successful or still in the early stages. Although the campus is relatively small, it is well-equipped. The classrooms are spacious and offer a variety of useful resources. There are also several social spaces for students to enjoy, including a nap room, a game room, limited green areas, and more. Additionally, the university is located in one of the best areas of the city, surrounded by restaurants, shopping malls, and countless activities—making student life both convenient and vibrant. In my experience, the professors have been excellent—knowledgeable, respectful, and supportive. However, I’m aware that some of my peers have had less positive interactions. That said, not everything has been perfect. The course registration process can vary between being highly efficient and extremely chaotic. I’ve had instances where I had to argue with administrative staff just to complete a simple request, which often took a long time to resolve. Additionally, many students (though not myself) have raised concerns about the curriculum including courses that don’t seem essential to our field—such as statistics, multiple entrepreneurship classes, and geopolitical studies. Overall, my experience at Ean University has been very positive, though there is definitely room for improvement, particularly in administrative processes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show