Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina (5.00)
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 4/7 categories
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Science (Recreation and Sports Management)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.92
Win
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.86
Win
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.21
Win
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.84
Win
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.79
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.79
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Quality programs and affordable tuition
  • +Practical experience and real-world application
  • +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

Nothing to show

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

Nothing to show

The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

Nothing to show

All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
81%
0%
67%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
13%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close