Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA vs Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL

Side-by-side comparison from 57 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 1/5 categories
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 1/5 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/5 categories
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL: wins 3/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
4.00
4.20
4.88
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.92
4.50
3.80
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.86
4.00
4.17
4.63
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.21
5.00
Win
3.00
3.50
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.84
Win
4.00
4.20
4.38
3.00
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.79
4.00
4.50
4.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
3.79
4.00
3.00
4.29
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Excellent instructors and well-equipped facilities enhance learning.
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness is highly valued.
  • +Innovative programs and support for students entering the workforce are appreciated.
  • +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
  • +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
  • +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are consistently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, scoring an impressive 4.875. **Professors** also receive high marks at 4.625, alongside a strong **Value** rating of 4.75. The **Location** and **Student Life** also fare well. However, **Internationality** is the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.

This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

All 8 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students frequently praise excellent facilities, capable instructors, and strong preparation for the workforce. There is no negative feedback.

With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
81%
40%
43%
50%
100%
0%
100%
4★
13%
60%
29%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
6%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close