Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina vs Universidad Central - Ucentral

Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina (5.00)
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 4/7 categories
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 1/7 categories
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Science (Recreation and Sports Management)
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
4.00
4.60
4.67
Win
4.50
3.50
Not rated
Location
4.92
Win
4.50
4.00
4.67
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Professors
4.86
Win
4.00
4.67
4.67
4.25
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.21
5.00
Win
4.67
3.67
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.85
Win
4.00
4.20
4.67
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.79
Win
4.00
4.17
4.33
4.25
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.85
4.00
4.00
3.67
4.25
Win
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Quality programs and affordable tuition
  • +Practical experience and real-world application
  • +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements
  • +Supportive learning environment and quality programs
  • +Welcoming and student-friendly atmosphere
  • +Financial accessibility and athletic opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs with qualified instructors and research opportunities.
  • +Practical learning experiences and updated course content.
  • +Accessible location and vibrant campus life.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently a source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff create dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.

This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities** (4.5) and strong scores for **Professors** (4.25) and **Value** (4.25), suggesting a positive learning environment and good return on investment. **Accommodation** also receives a high rating (4.25). The weakest area, **Internationality**, with a score of 3, indicates room for improvement in global engagement. **Location** and **Student Life** are rated well at 4.

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **location** with a rating of 4.5. **Professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also received favorable scores of 4. The university's **internationality** is its weakest area, rated at 3. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.5, while the overall **value** is considered good at 4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are highly positive, highlighting supportive staff and a great learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight qualified instructors, strong research promotion, and efforts to improve practical education. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
81%
40%
86%
100%
33%
33%
0%
4★
13%
60%
14%
0%
33%
67%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close