Birzeit University - BZU vs American College Dublin - ACD vs Kütahya Dumlupınar University - dpü vs T John College vs Tokushima University

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Birzeit University - BZU (4.30)
Birzeit University - BZU: wins 1/4 categories
American College Dublin - ACD: wins 0/4 categories
Kütahya Dumlupınar University - dpü: wins 1/4 categories
T John College: wins 0/4 categories
Tokushima University: wins 2/4 categories
Stockholm School of Economics in Riga - SSE Riga: wins 0/4 categories
Thakur College of Engineering and Technology: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Birzeit, Palestine
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Bengaluru, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Tokushima, Japan
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil and Environmental Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
2.87
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.33
Win
3.20
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
3.86
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.67
3.71
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
2.87
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.33
3.71
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
2.93
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging courses and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Welcoming environment and diverse student body.
  • +Strong student support and resources.
  • +Passionate and supportive faculty with personalized attention
  • +Strong focus on student success and career development
  • +Welcoming city environment and convenient accommodations
  • +Supportive and well-informed faculty
  • +Diverse student body fostering varied opinions and active learning
  • +Stimulating and competitive academic programs

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Practical, research-based learning
  • +Strong international student focus

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and financial mismanagement, including delayed refunds and staff turnover.
  • -Concerns about academic stability and frequent changes in teaching staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum planning lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a well-rounded profile. Its strongest areas include location and value, both scoring a high 4.33. Facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation also received solid marks of 4. Internationality emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.67. Overall, the university seems to offer a good experience across most aspects.

This institution's strengths lie in its **Professors**, with a solid rating of 3.86, and its **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring 3.71. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include **Facilities** and **Student Life**, each receiving a 2.87 rating. **Location** and **Accommodation** fall in the mid-range, with scores of 3.2 and 2.93 respectively.

This institution garners excellent scores for its professors, a clear highlight at 5/5. Facilities and accommodation are also strong, both receiving a 4/5. The university offers good value and a solid international presence. Areas for potential improvement include location and student life, which received moderate ratings of 3 and 3.5 respectively.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university garners a very positive assessment. Its strongest areas include accommodation and value, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are also highly rated. The location is its weakest point, scoring a moderate three out of five.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students highly praise the university's environment and resources, noting knowledgeable professors and welcoming spaces. The diverse student body and available specializations are also highlighted as positives. No negative feedback was received.

Most (approximately 86%) of the 14 reviews are highly positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive faculty, small class sizes, and career development. A small percentage (~7%) of feedback mentioned financial issues and staff retention.

With an average rating of 4/5, all available feedback is positive. Students praise the university's faculty and supportive environment. The diverse student body and competitive programs also contribute to a positive experience.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, rating the university 4 out of 5 stars. This feedback highlights helpful faculty and a research-based curriculum beneficial for international students. Negative feedback is negligible.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
67%
79%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close