Université de Tours vs Polytech Tours vs IÉSEG School of Management vs Excelia Business School vs ESG Ecoles de Commerce
Side-by-side comparison from 284 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent international student services & administrative support
- +Friendly, accessible, and qualified teaching staff
- +Varied courses & engaging cultural/integration activities
Nothing to show
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Supportive, approachable professors and strong emphasis on practical, real-world business applications.
- +Diverse, international environment fostering personal growth and unforgettable shared experiences.
- +Opportunities for teamwork, self-discovery, and engaging learning through case studies and projects.
- +Modern campus with diverse programs and extracurricular activities
- +Attentive and available staff
- +Practical training and professional opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Rigorous, relevant courses and expert, accessible teaching
- +Valuable practical experience through internships and networking
- +Attentive, supportive staff and accessible, quality resources
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
Nothing to show
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring concern.
- -A lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently problematic.
- -Lack of essential resources and support hinders learning.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths, particularly in accommodation and internationality, both receiving perfect scores. Student life and professors also score highly, indicating a positive learning and social environment. Conversely, the location receives a score of zero, representing a notable weakness. Facilities are rated moderately, while overall value is considered good.
Nothing to show
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
This university garners an impressive average rating of 4.19. Its strongest areas are **Internationality** (4.57) and **Student Life** (4.34), indicating a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. **Facilities** (4.24) and **Location** (4.27) also score very well. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.74, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both earning perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. The university performs well in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation**, each receiving a solid 4. While **Value** is also strong at 4.5, these three areas represent the relative lowest scores in its otherwise impressive profile.
Nothing to show
**Across various metrics, the institution demonstrates notable strengths and areas for development.** Professors and location stand out as exceptionally strong, both receiving a high rating of 4.8. Internationality also scores well at 4.4. Conversely, student life and accommodation are the weakest areas, with ratings of 3.4 and 3.6 respectively. Facilities and overall value are rated solidly in the mid-range.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight excellent foreign student services, helpful and qualified teaching staff, and a good variety of integration activities.
Nothing to show
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
The reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent professors, practical courses, and a strong international environment. Students appreciate teamwork opportunities and the school's ability to foster personal growth and unforgettable experiences.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of reviews are positive, highlighting a modern campus with numerous activities and an attentive staff. Students also appreciate the diversified, practice-oriented programs with multiple sector choices.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise rigorous, relevant courses, expert teachers, and opportunities for skill development and career preparation. A small portion of feedback noted occasional changes to the schedule.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
